LaToya E. Eaves

615 citations
22 papers · 284 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

LaToya E. Eaves

19 papers receiving 265 citations

Peers

LaToya E. Eaves
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Geography, Planning and Development 107
  • Urban Studies 41
  • Sociology and Political Science 166
  • Cultural Studies 24
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22
Replace Camilla Hawthorne with:
Camilla Hawthorne United States
Jen Bagelman United Kingdom
Brandi Thompson Summers United States
Lasse Martin Koefoed Denmark
Chris McMorran Singapore
Miriam Tedeschi Finland
Yasmeen Arif India
Keisha‐Khan Y. Perry United States
Martha Radice Canada
Sonia Lehman-Frisch France
LaToya E. Eaves relative to Camilla Hawthorne United States Camilla Hawthorne's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Camilla Hawthorne · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by LaToya E. Eaves

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of LaToya E. Eaves's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by LaToya E. Eaves with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites LaToya E. Eaves more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by LaToya E. Eaves

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by LaToya E. Eaves. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by LaToya E. Eaves. The network helps show where LaToya E. Eaves may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside LaToya E. Eaves, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with LaToya E. Eaves Line = papers co-authored together LaToya E. Eaves links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201761
2 201748
3 201944
4 202043
5 202023
6 201911
7 202010
8 20237
9 20167
10 20236
11 20236
12 20135
13 20164
14 20223
15 20222
16 20231
17 20251
18 20221
19 20151
20 20250

About LaToya E. Eaves

LaToya E. Eaves is a scholar working on Geography, Planning and Development, Sociology and Political Science, Urban Studies, Museology and General Health Professions, having authored 22 papers that have together received 284 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geographies of human-animal interactions (7 papers), Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (6 papers), Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (5 papers), Historical Geography and Geographical Thought (5 papers), Urban Planning and Governance (4 papers), Race, History, and American Society (4 papers), Data Analysis and Archiving (2 papers) and Homelessness and Social Issues (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (107 citations), Urban Studies (41 citations), Sociology and Political Science (166 citations), Cultural Studies (24 citations) and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (22 citations). LaToya E. Eaves has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Adam Bledsoe, Brian Williams, Phil Klein, Derek H. Alderman, Karen Falconer Al‐Hindi, Katherine Hankins, Daniel Block, Amanda Rees, Jonnell Robinson and Patricia Yajaira Jadán Solis. Their work appears in journals such as Gender Place & Culture, The Professional Geographer, Southeastern geographer, Journal of Geography in Higher Education and Tourism Geographies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact