Amanda Rees

888 citations
41 papers · 539 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Amanda Rees

34 papers receiving 476 citations

Peers

Amanda Rees
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Geography, Planning and Development 120
  • History and Philosophy of Science 30
  • General Psychology 7
  • Social Psychology 96
  • Developmental Biology 9
Replace Alain Corbin with:
Alain Corbin France
Stephen P Hugh-Jones United Kingdom
Franz Boas United States
Sarah Humphreys United States
Bain Attwood Australia
Ronald Hutton United Kingdom
Paul Stuart Landau United States
Robert A. Brightman United States
Zakiyyah Iman Jackson United States
Alice Β. Kehoe United States
Amanda Rees relative to Alain Corbin France Alain Corbin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.5×
Alain Corbin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Rees

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Rees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Rees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Rees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Rees

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Rees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Rees. The network helps show where Amanda Rees may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amanda Rees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amanda Rees Line = papers co-authored together Amanda Rees links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201485
2 200766
3 202043
4 201641
5 200929
6 200729
7 199027
8 200125
9
Peer Mentoring Communities of Practice for Early and Mid-Career Faculty: Broad Benefits from a Research-Oriented Female Peer Mentoring Group.
201423
10 202117
11 200017
12 200117
13 200617
14 201715
15 197511
16 202011
17 20007
18 20166
19 20096
20 20196

About Amanda Rees

Amanda Rees is a scholar working on Geography, Planning and Development, History and Philosophy of Science, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Immunology and Allergy, having authored 41 papers that have together received 539 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Primate Behavior and Ecology (5 papers), History of Science and Natural History (5 papers), Geography Education and Pedagogy (5 papers), History of Science and Medicine (4 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (4 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (3 papers), Geographic Information Systems Studies (3 papers) and Spatial Cognition and Navigation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (120 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (30 citations), General Psychology (7 citations), Social Psychology (96 citations) and Developmental Biology (9 citations). Amanda Rees has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jane Shakespeare‐Finch, Deanne Armstrong, Daniel Block, Jonnell Robinson, Stevi Jackson, Patricia Yajaira Jadán Solis, Jin-Kyu Jung, Hamil Pearsall, Jerry Shannon and Heather A. Fischer. Their work appears in journals such as Social Studies of Science, Osiris, Journal of Peptide Science, History of Science and Journal of Cultural Geography.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact