Amanda Rees

874 citations
40 papers · 529 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Amanda Rees

34 papers receiving 472 citations

Peers

Amanda Rees
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Geography, Planning and Development 122
  • History and Philosophy of Science 30
  • General Psychology 7
  • Social Psychology 91
  • Developmental Biology 9
Replace Gregg Mitman with:
Gregg Mitman United States
Jennifer Terry United States
Michael P. Carroll Canada
Alain Corbin France
Bain Attwood Australia
S. C. Humphreys United States
Franz Boas United States
Ronald Hutton United Kingdom
Robert Brightman United States
Joanna Russ United States
Amanda Rees relative to Gregg Mitman United States Gregg Mitman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Gregg Mitman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Rees

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Rees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Rees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Rees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Rees

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Rees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Rees. The network helps show where Amanda Rees may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amanda Rees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amanda Rees Line = papers co-authored together Amanda Rees links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201481
2 200769
3 202041
4 201641
5 200930
6 200728
7 199025
8
Peer Mentoring Communities of Practice for Early and Mid-Career Faculty: Broad Benefits from a Research-Oriented Female Peer Mentoring Group.
201423
9 200123
10 200017
11 202116
12 200116
13 200616
14 201716
15 197511
16 202011
17 20007
18 20166
19 20096
20 20196

About Amanda Rees

Amanda Rees is a scholar working on Geography, Planning and Development, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science and Ecology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 529 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geography Education and Pedagogy (5 papers), History of Science and Natural History (5 papers), History of Science and Medicine (4 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (4 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (4 papers), Geographic Information Systems Studies (3 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (3 papers) and Spatial Cognition and Navigation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (122 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (30 citations), General Psychology (7 citations), Social Psychology (91 citations) and Developmental Biology (9 citations). Amanda Rees has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Deanne Armstrong, Jane Shakespeare‐Finch, Daniel Block, Stevi Jackson, Patricia Solís, Hamil Pearsall, Heather Fischer, Jerry Shannon, Timothy L. Hawthorne and Katherine Hankins. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Peptide Science, History of Science, Osiris, Social Studies of Science and History of the Human Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact