L.A.M. Gomide
Impact in
- Animal Science and Zoology top 2%
- Meat and Animal Product Quality
- Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Food Science top 10%
- Food Quality and Safety Studies
Papers in
-
- Meat and Animal Product Quality 12
- Animal Nutrition and Physiology 5
-
- Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods 2
- Co-authors
- Eduardo Mendes Ramos (7 shared papers)Paulo Rogério Fontes (6 shared papers)E. de S. Viana (1 shared paper)Alcinéia de Lemos Souza Ramos (3 shared papers)Márcio Machado Ladeira (1 shared paper)Luíz Alexandre Peternelli (3 shared papers)Edimar Aparecida Filomeno Fontes (3 shared papers)Paulo Sávio Lopes (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Meat Science (7 papers)Food Chemistry (1 paper)Journal of Animal Science (1 paper)Aquaculture (1 paper)LWT (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- BrazilUnited States
In The Last Decade
L.A.M. Gomide
16 papers receiving 341 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Animal Science and Zoology 286
- Food Science 108
- Biotechnology 22
- Insect Science 28
- Small Animals 15
Countries citing papers authored by L.A.M. Gomide
This map shows the geographic impact of L.A.M. Gomide's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L.A.M. Gomide with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L.A.M. Gomide more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by L.A.M. Gomide
This network shows the impact of papers produced by L.A.M. Gomide. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L.A.M. Gomide. The network helps show where L.A.M. Gomide may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside L.A.M. Gomide, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 76 | |
| 2 | 2005 | 75 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 42 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 24 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 23 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 22 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 16 | |
| 8 | 2005 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2004 | 14 | |
| 10 | 1999 | 13 | |
| 11 | 1994 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 10 | |
| 13 | 2005 | 10 | |
| 14 | 1997 | 3 | |
| 15 | Performance, carcass yield and meat quality traits of F2 crosses between Brazilian native and commercial pigs for QTL mapping. | 2002 | 2 |
| 16 | 1997 | 2 |
About L.A.M. Gomide
L.A.M. Gomide is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Food Science, Genetics, Biomedical Engineering and Molecular Biology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 357 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meat and Animal Product Quality (12 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (5 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (3 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (3 papers), Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (2 papers), Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (2 papers), Biochemical effects in animals (2 papers) and Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (286 citations), Food Science (108 citations), Biotechnology (22 citations), Insect Science (28 citations) and Small Animals (15 citations). L.A.M. Gomide has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil and United States. Frequent co-authors include Eduardo Mendes Ramos, Paulo Rogério Fontes, E. de S. Viana, Alcinéia de Lemos Souza Ramos, Márcio Machado Ladeira, Luíz Alexandre Peternelli, Edimar Aparecida Filomeno Fontes, Paulo Sávio Lopes, Simone Eliza Facioni Guimarães and R. B. Cox. Their work appears in journals such as Meat Science, Food Chemistry, Journal of Animal Science, Aquaculture and LWT.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.