L. E. Sacks
Impact in
- Biotechnology top 10%
- Microbial Inactivation Methods
- Food Science top 10%
- Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Papers in
-
- Probiotics and Fermented Foods 7
-
- Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research 7
- Co-authors
- Gordon Alderton (1 shared paper)Philip A. Thompson (4 shared papers)Glen F. Bailey (3 shared papers)H. Albert Barker (1 shared paper)James T. MacGregor (3 shared papers)John J. Windle (1 shared paper)Eleanor M. Humphreys (1 shared paper)Robert E. Lundin (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Bacteriology (10 papers)Applied and Environmental Microbiology (6 papers)Journal of Food Science (2 papers)Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (2 papers)Canadian Journal of Microbiology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
L. E. Sacks
37 papers receiving 564 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Biotechnology 91
- Food Science 102
- Microbiology 4
- Infectious Diseases 89
- Molecular Biology 286
Countries citing papers authored by L. E. Sacks
This map shows the geographic impact of L. E. Sacks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L. E. Sacks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L. E. Sacks more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by L. E. Sacks
This network shows the impact of papers produced by L. E. Sacks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L. E. Sacks. The network helps show where L. E. Sacks may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 18 scholars most cited alongside L. E. Sacks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1961 | 115 | |
| 2 | 1965 | 71 | |
| 3 | 1978 | 52 | |
| 4 | 1952 | 49 | |
| 5 | 1954 | 32 | |
| 6 | 1963 | 29 | |
| 7 | 1963 | 28 | |
| 8 | 1977 | 27 | |
| 9 | 1990 | 25 | |
| 10 | 1986 | 21 | |
| 11 | 1956 | 20 | |
| 12 | 1976 | 20 | |
| 13 | 1982 | 17 | |
| 14 | 1983 | 16 | |
| 15 | 1951 | 14 | |
| 16 | 1988 | 12 | |
| 17 | 1986 | 12 | |
| 18 | 1979 | 11 | |
| 19 | 1983 | 9 | |
| 20 | 1971 | 8 |
About L. E. Sacks
L. E. Sacks is a scholar working on Food Science, Infectious Diseases, Molecular Biology, Biotechnology and Genetics, having authored 38 papers that have together received 668 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (7 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (7 papers), Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (7 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (4 papers), Gut microbiota and health (4 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (3 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (3 papers) and Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (91 citations), Food Science (102 citations), Microbiology (4 citations), Infectious Diseases (89 citations) and Molecular Biology (286 citations). L. E. Sacks has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Gordon Alderton, Philip A. Thompson, Glen F. Bailey, H. Albert Barker, James T. MacGregor, John J. Windle, Eleanor M. Humphreys, Robert E. Lundin, Alfred C. Olson and Peter Setlow. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Bacteriology, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Journal of Food Science, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences and Canadian Journal of Microbiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.