L. E. Sacks
Impact in
- Biotechnology top 10%
- Microbial Inactivation Methods
- Food Science top 10%
- Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Papers in
-
- Gut microbiota and health 4
- Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research 3
-
- Probiotics and Fermented Foods 7
- Co-authors
- Gordon Alderton (1 shared paper)Philip A. Thompson (4 shared papers)Glen F. Bailey (3 shared papers)H.A. Barker (1 shared paper)James T. MacGregor (2 shared papers)J. J. Windle (1 shared paper)Eleanor M. Humphreys (1 shared paper)Robert E. Lundin (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Bacteriology (10 papers)Applied and Environmental Microbiology (6 papers)Canadian Journal of Microbiology (2 papers)Journal of Food Science (2 papers)Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
L. E. Sacks
34 papers receiving 510 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Biotechnology 85
- Food Science 93
- Infectious Diseases 77
- Microbiology 3
- Molecular Biology 251
Countries citing papers authored by L. E. Sacks
This map shows the geographic impact of L. E. Sacks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L. E. Sacks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L. E. Sacks more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by L. E. Sacks
This network shows the impact of papers produced by L. E. Sacks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L. E. Sacks. The network helps show where L. E. Sacks may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 17 scholars most cited alongside L. E. Sacks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1961 | 106 | |
| 2 | 1965 | 67 | |
| 3 | 1978 | 47 | |
| 4 | 1952 | 41 | |
| 5 | 1954 | 29 | |
| 6 | 1963 | 27 | |
| 7 | 1963 | 26 | |
| 8 | 1977 | 25 | |
| 9 | 1990 | 25 | |
| 10 | 1956 | 20 | |
| 11 | 1986 | 18 | |
| 12 | 1976 | 15 | |
| 13 | 1982 | 14 | |
| 14 | 1951 | 13 | |
| 15 | 1988 | 12 | |
| 16 | 1986 | 12 | |
| 17 | 1983 | 10 | |
| 18 | 1971 | 8 | |
| 19 | 1983 | 8 | |
| 20 | 1955 | 8 |
About L. E. Sacks
L. E. Sacks is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Food Science, Infectious Diseases, Genetics and Ecology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 595 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Probiotics and Fermented Foods (7 papers), Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (7 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (7 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (4 papers), Gut microbiota and health (4 papers), Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research (3 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (2 papers) and Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (85 citations), Food Science (93 citations), Infectious Diseases (77 citations), Microbiology (3 citations) and Molecular Biology (251 citations). L. E. Sacks has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Gordon Alderton, Philip A. Thompson, Glen F. Bailey, H.A. Barker, James T. MacGregor, J. J. Windle, Eleanor M. Humphreys, Robert E. Lundin, Alfred C. Olson and Peter Setlow. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Bacteriology, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Canadian Journal of Microbiology, Journal of Food Science and Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.