Klaus Schott

51 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Klaus Schott
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Biological Psychiatry 228
  • Developmental Neuroscience 169
  • Neurology 319
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 407
  • Physiology 473
Replace Jennifer R. Cracchiolo with:
Jennifer R. Cracchiolo United States
Donna Sheedy Australia
Anna Parachikova United States
Xiu‐Qing Yao China
Mario Stampanoni Bassi Italy
Chun‐Hsien Chu Taiwan
Sama F. Sleiman United States
Kathryn Nichol United States
Consuelo Guerri Spain
Yanning Qian China
Klaus Schott relative to Jennifer R. Cracchiolo United States Jennifer R. Cracchiolo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jennifer R. Cracchiolo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Klaus Schott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Klaus Schott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Klaus Schott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Klaus Schott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Klaus Schott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Klaus Schott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Klaus Schott. The network helps show where Klaus Schott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Klaus Schott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Klaus Schott Line = papers co-authored together Klaus Schott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005275
2 2006243
3 2006139
4 2007103
5 2006102
6 200580
7 200764
8 201333
9 200632
10 200630
11 200326
12 200525
13 199123
14 198922
15 199622
16 199219
17 200418
18 200216
19 198816
20 198414

About Klaus Schott

Klaus Schott is a scholar working on Physiology, Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Biological Psychiatry and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (9 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (9 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (6 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (5 papers), Diabetes and associated disorders (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (3 papers) and Air Quality and Health Impacts (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (228 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (169 citations), Neurology (319 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (407 citations) and Physiology (473 citations). Klaus Schott has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Slovakia. Frequent co-authors include Gerhard Buchkremer, Elke Stransky, Christoph Laske, E. Richartz, M. Bartels, Thomas Leyhe, Andreas Wittorf, Gerhard W. Eschweiler, Anil Batra and Walter Maetzler. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Psychiatric Research, Psychiatry Research, Journal of Neuroimmunology, Acta Neurologica Scandinavica and European Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact