Kim Win Pang

749 citations
5 papers · 80 · h-index 4

Impact in

    • Microbial infections and disease research
    • Bacteriophages and microbial interactions

Papers in

Kim Win Pang

5 papers receiving 75 citations

Peers

Kim Win Pang
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
  • Microbiology 26
  • Ecology 58
  • Endocrinology 7
  • Infectious Diseases 20
  • Molecular Medicine 5
Replace Susanna R. Grigson with:
Susanna R. Grigson Australia
Catherine M. Mageeney United States
Madison Cristinziano United States
Kārlis Rācenis Latvia
Linlin Li China
Melissa Pitton Switzerland
Brieuc Van Nieuwenhuyse Belgium
Shaleni Singh United States
Manuela Iten Switzerland
Jay C. Humphrey United States
Kim Win Pang relative to Susanna R. Grigson Australia Susanna R. Grigson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Susanna R. Grigson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kim Win Pang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kim Win Pang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kim Win Pang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kim Win Pang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kim Win Pang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kim Win Pang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kim Win Pang. The network helps show where Kim Win Pang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Kim Win Pang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kim Win Pang Line = papers co-authored together Kim Win Pang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

5 of 5 papers shown
#Work
1 201962
2
Vibrio vulnificus septicemia in a patient with liver cirrhosis.
19948
3 20165
4 20224
5 20221

About Kim Win Pang

Kim Win Pang is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Health Information Management, General Health Professions, Ecology and Epidemiology, having authored 5 papers that have together received 80 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electronic Health Records Systems (2 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (1 paper), SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing (1 paper), Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (1 paper), Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management (1 paper), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (1 paper), Vibrio bacteria research studies (1 paper) and Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (26 citations), Ecology (58 citations), Endocrinology (7 citations), Infectious Diseases (20 citations) and Molecular Medicine (5 citations). Kim Win Pang has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Sarah Djebara, Daniël De Vos, Jean‐Paul Pirnay, Patrick Soentjens, Maya Merabishvili, Thomas Y.K. Chan, Liselotte Coorevits, Ronald Cornet, Jos Van Acker and Stephanie Medlock. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Education, Viruses, International Journal of Medical Informatics, Acta Clinica Belgica and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact