Daniël De Vos

85 papers receiving 5.3k citations

Daniël De Vos's Hit Papers

The Magistral Phage 2018 · 265 citations
2650+5+10Years since publication100200300400500

Peers

Daniël De Vos
Comparison fields: 5 of 149
  • Microbiology 1.3k
  • Molecular Medicine 1.0k
  • Ecology 3.3k
  • Endocrinology 523
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 88
Replace Jean‐Paul Pirnay with:
Jean‐Paul Pirnay Belgium
Lucía Fernández Spain
Jeremy J. Barr Australia
Elizabeth Kutter United States
José R. Penadés Spain
Mario F. Feldman United States
Steven P. Djordjevic Australia
Craig Winstanley United Kingdom
Makoto Ohnishi Japan
Mikael Skurnik Finland
Daniël De Vos relative to Jean‐Paul Pirnay Belgium Jean‐Paul Pirnay's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jean‐Paul Pirnay · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniël De Vos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniël De Vos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniël De Vos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniël De Vos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniël De Vos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniël De Vos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniël De Vos. The network helps show where Daniël De Vos may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniël De Vos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniël De Vos Line = papers co-authored together Daniël De Vos links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 86 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Phage Therapy in Clinical Practice: Treatment of Human Infections
Hit paper breakdown →
2010560
2 2009422
3
The Magistral Phage
Hit paper breakdown →
2018265
4 2010249
5 2009226
6 1997219
7 1997204
8
Experimental phage therapy of burn wound infection: difficult first steps.
2014183
9 2001152
10 2012143
11 2003138
12 2013126
13 2005125
14 2002100
15 2000100
16 200298
17 201198
18 201794
19 201494
20 201583

About Daniël De Vos

Daniël De Vos is a scholar working on Ecology, Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Molecular Medicine and Microbiology, having authored 86 papers that have together received 5.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (45 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (17 papers), Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (12 papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (12 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (11 papers), Microbial infections and disease research (11 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (7 papers) and Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (1.3k citations), Molecular Medicine (1.0k citations), Ecology (3.3k citations), Endocrinology (523 citations) and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (88 citations). Daniël De Vos has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jean‐Paul Pirnay, Gilbert Verbeken, Pierre Cornélis, Martin Zizi, Mario Vaneechoutte, Maia Merabishvili, Serge Jennes, Rob Lavigne, Isabelle Huys and A. Vanderkelen. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Environmental Microbiology, International Journal of Infectious Diseases, Microbiology and International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact