Ken Spearpoint

1.2k citations
15 papers · 220 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Ken Spearpoint

15 papers receiving 208 citations

Peers

Ken Spearpoint
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Emergency Medicine 156
  • Emergency Medical Services 49
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 29
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 15
  • Family Practice 5
Replace Malte Issleib with:
Malte Issleib Germany
D. van Groeningen Netherlands
Ellen Knodel United States
Mary Ann McNeil United States
Silje Ødegaard Norway
Michael Czekajło United States
J.M.A. Hendrick Netherlands
Clément Buléon France
Rosalind Case Australia
Sören Weber Denmark
Ken Spearpoint relative to Malte Issleib Germany Malte Issleib's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Malte Issleib · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ken Spearpoint

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ken Spearpoint's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ken Spearpoint with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ken Spearpoint more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ken Spearpoint

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ken Spearpoint. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ken Spearpoint. The network helps show where Ken Spearpoint may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ken Spearpoint, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ken Spearpoint Line = papers co-authored together Ken Spearpoint links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 200952
2 200444
3 200738
4 201535
5 200514
6 202313
7 20058
8 20045
9 20213
10 20083
11
Abstract 104: The Utility of Cerebral Oximetry (rSO2%) During In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest as a Marker for the Prediction of Return of Spontaneous Circulation (ROSC)
20131
12 20151
13 20221
14 19931
15 20201

About Ken Spearpoint

Ken Spearpoint is a scholar working on Emergency Medicine, Emergency Medical Services, General Health Professions, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Physiology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 220 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (9 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (3 papers), Disaster Response and Management (3 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (3 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (2 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (2 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (2 papers) and Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (156 citations), Emergency Medical Services (49 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (29 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (15 citations) and Family Practice (5 citations). Ken Spearpoint has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Belgium and United States. Frequent co-authors include Stephen J. Brett, Pascale Gruber, Sam Parnia, P. B. C. Fenwick, Jerry P. Nolan, Jasmeet Soar, David Pitcher, Sarah Mitchell, Ben King and Gavin D. Perkins. Their work appears in journals such as Resuscitation, BMJ Quality & Safety, Circulation, Nursing Standard and Psychiatric Bulletin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact