Ken Chadwick

11 papers receiving 748 citations

Peers

Ken Chadwick
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Gender Studies 437
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 223
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 294
  • Accounting 293
  • Business and International Management 25
Replace Kiran M. Ismail with:
Kiran M. Ismail United States
Dawn Harris United States
Julie I. Siciliano United States
Jeremy J. Marcel United States
Ursula Glunk Netherlands
David H. Zhu United States
Rembrand Koning United States
Kjersten Bunker Whittington United States
Patricia L. Nemetz United States
Edward J. Carberry United States
Ken Chadwick relative to Kiran M. Ismail United States Kiran M. Ismail's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Kiran M. Ismail · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ken Chadwick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ken Chadwick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ken Chadwick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ken Chadwick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ken Chadwick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ken Chadwick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ken Chadwick. The network helps show where Ken Chadwick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Ken Chadwick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ken Chadwick Line = papers co-authored together Ken Chadwick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2002372
2 2003161
3 201396
4 200490
5 200970
6 199518
7
An Empirical Analysis of the Entrepreneurial Orientation Scale
200813
8
Response to Hurricane Katrina: A Small Business Approach
20085
9 20193
10 19971
11
Entering the ice cream business: A case study of kleinpeter farms dairy
20101
12 20180

About Ken Chadwick

Ken Chadwick is a scholar working on Management of Technology and Innovation, Gender Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Accounting and Strategy and Management, having authored 12 papers that have together received 830 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender Diversity and Inequality (4 papers), Family Business Performance and Succession (4 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (4 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (3 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (1 paper), Plasma and Flow Control in Aerodynamics (1 paper), Higher Education Learning Practices (1 paper) and Higher Education and Employability (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (437 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (223 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (294 citations), Accounting (293 citations) and Business and International Management (25 citations). Ken Chadwick has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Orlando C. Richard, Sean Dwyer, Amy Gross McMillan, Susan L. Kirby, Tim Barnett, Ping Wu, Joseph A. Schetz, Rodney Bowersox, John James Cater and James J. Chrisman. Their work appears in journals such as The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Group & Organization Management, AIAA Journal and Journal of Business Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact