Keith Simmons

422 citations
25 papers · 216 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Keith Simmons

21 papers receiving 179 citations

Peers

Keith Simmons
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • History and Philosophy of Science 62
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 155
  • Philosophy 109
  • Theoretical Computer Science 7
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 38
Replace Ken Akiba with:
Ken Akiba United States
Salvatore Florio United States
Luca Incurvati Netherlands
Florian Steinberger United Kingdom
Igal Kvart Israel
Denis Bonnay France
Julien Murzi Germany
Lionel Shapiro United States
Juhani Yli‐Vakkuri Norway
Jeffrey Sanford Russell United States
Keith Simmons relative to Ken Akiba United States Ken Akiba's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
Ken Akiba · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Keith Simmons

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keith Simmons's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith Simmons with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith Simmons more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keith Simmons

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith Simmons. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith Simmons. The network helps show where Keith Simmons may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Keith Simmons, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Keith Simmons Line = papers co-authored together Keith Simmons links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199384
2 199925
3 200419
4 200016
5 199014
6 20187
7 19876
8 19946
9 19946
10 20135
11 20185
12 20065
13 20184
14 19934
15 20093
16 20072
17 20181
18 20161
19 19951
20 20051

About Keith Simmons

Keith Simmons is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Artificial Intelligence and Language and Linguistics, having authored 25 papers that have together received 216 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (12 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (6 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (3 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (3 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (3 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (2 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (2 papers) and Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (62 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (155 citations), Philosophy (109 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (7 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (38 citations). Keith Simmons has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Dorit Bar‐On and Patrick Grim. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Studies, History and Philosophy of Logic, Journal of Philosophical Logic, Topoi and Synthese.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact