Keith E. Niedermeier

14 papers receiving 348 citations

Peers

Keith E. Niedermeier
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • General Decision Sciences 38
  • Marketing 80
  • Applied Psychology 37
  • Law 83
  • Information Systems and Management 54
Replace Daniel R. Toy with:
Daniel R. Toy United States
Richard T. Marcy United States
Kate Barasz United States
Shay Sayre United States
Michelle P. Lee Singapore
Connie R. Bateman United States
Heather Davison United Kingdom
Susan M.B. Schertzer United States
George E. Stevens United States
Jens Mazei Germany
Keith E. Niedermeier relative to Daniel R. Toy United States Daniel R. Toy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10.4×
Daniel R. Toy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Keith E. Niedermeier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keith E. Niedermeier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith E. Niedermeier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith E. Niedermeier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keith E. Niedermeier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith E. Niedermeier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith E. Niedermeier. The network helps show where Keith E. Niedermeier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Keith E. Niedermeier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Keith E. Niedermeier Line = papers co-authored together Keith E. Niedermeier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 200085
2 201671
3 199957
4 200647
5 199936
6 202030
7 199927
8 200118
9 20009
10 19995
11
Statistical Analysis of Longitudinal Categorical Data in the Social and Behavioral Sciences: An introduction With Computer Illustrations
19995
12 20142
13 20002
14 20091

About Keith E. Niedermeier

Keith E. Niedermeier is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Law, Cognitive Neuroscience, Literature and Literary Theory and Applied Psychology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 395 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Jury Decision Making Processes (4 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Media Influence and Health (3 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (3 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (2 papers) and Computational and Text Analysis Methods (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (38 citations), Marketing (80 citations), Applied Psychology (37 citations), Law (83 citations) and Information Systems and Management (54 citations). Keith E. Niedermeier has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Hong Kong and China. Frequent co-authors include Norbert L. Kerr, Xiaohan Zhang, Martin F. Kaplan, Nicole M. Kuiper, Amani El-Alayli, Allen R. McConnell, Jill M. Leibold, Irwin A. Horowitz, Lawrence A. Messé and Marvin E. Goldberg. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Psychology and Marketing, Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations and Journal of Public Policy & Marketing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact