Katherine M. Wright

63 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Katherine M. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 161
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 61
  • Clinical Biochemistry 248
  • Health 145
  • Occupational Therapy 52
  • Applied Psychology 60
Replace Esther Kahana with:
Esther Kahana Israel
Daniela Simón Germany
David L. Coulter United States
Arno K. Kumagai United States
Elizabeth G. Hunter United States
PETER L. HUDSON Australia
Karen Anne Sullivan Australia
Michael MacLean Canada
Alvin G. Thomas United States
Inger Johanne Bakken Norway
Katherine M. Wright relative to Esther Kahana Israel Esther Kahana's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9.9×
Esther Kahana · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Katherine M. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Katherine M. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Katherine M. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Katherine M. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Katherine M. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Katherine M. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Katherine M. Wright. The network helps show where Katherine M. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Katherine M. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Katherine M. Wright Line = papers co-authored together Katherine M. Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 79 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1983384
2 2011311
3 2014302
4 2004246
5 2016165
6 200070
7 201167
8 201457
9 202148
10 201547
11 201041
12 201935
13 201830
14 201028
15 202126
16 202226
17
Finding the Perfect Match: Factors That Influence Family Medicine Residency Selection.
201620
18 201818
19 202014
20 202112

About Katherine M. Wright

Katherine M. Wright is a scholar working on Gender Studies, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 79 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diversity and Career in Medicine (6 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (2 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (2 papers), Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials (2 papers), Culinary Culture and Tourism (2 papers) and Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (61 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (248 citations), Health (145 citations), Occupational Therapy (52 citations) and Applied Psychology (60 citations). Katherine M. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Samuel Himmelfarb, Stanley A. F. Murrell, Michael Francis Fleming, Laura Boteler Humm, Morris David Bell, Emily J. Ginger, Dale E. Olsen, Michael Wright, Matthew J. Smith and Julie Lounds Taylor. Their work appears in journals such as Schizophrenia Research, The Annals of Family Medicine, Bioanalysis, The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease and PLoS Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact