Kate King

6.4k citations
14 papers · 166 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Kate King

12 papers receiving 163 citations

Peers

Kate King
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Health Informatics 14
  • Clinical Psychology 108
  • Family Practice 4
  • General Decision Sciences 4
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 3
Replace Shiv H Joshi with:
Shiv H Joshi India
Iain Brassington United Kingdom
Penny Harrison United Kingdom
Natali Rauseo-Ricupero United States
Abderrezzaq Soltani Qatar
Emiliano Zucchi Australia
Evans Appiah Osei Ghana
Asma Al Yahyaei Oman
Majed Mowanes Alruwaili Saudi Arabia
Janelle Barrera United States
Kate King relative to Shiv H Joshi India Shiv H Joshi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Shiv H Joshi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kate King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate King. The network helps show where Kate King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kate King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kate King Line = papers co-authored together Kate King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1
Quinte longitudinal study of gambling and problem gambling
201599
2 202331
3 201416
4 20235
5
Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic
20204
6
QLS front-line retention manual: methods for achieving a 94% cohort retention rate in longitudinal research
20144
7 20232
8 20231
9 20211
10 20231
11 20251
12 20011
13 20260
14 20240

About Kate King

Kate King is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Health, having authored 14 papers that have together received 166 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (2 papers), Healthcare Systems and Technology (2 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (1 paper), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper), COVID-19 and healthcare impacts (1 paper), Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (1 paper), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (1 paper) and Sex and Gender in Healthcare (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (14 citations), Clinical Psychology (108 citations), Family Practice (4 citations), General Decision Sciences (4 citations) and Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (3 citations). Kate King has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Iceland and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Donald Schopflocher, Robert J. Williams, Patricia McLaughlin, Nicholas J. White, Helen Leach, Rebecca Payne, Benjamin Steiner, Alan Simpson, Michael B. Smith and G. M. Williamson. Their work appears in journals such as OJIN The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, Criminal Justice Review, Maturitas, The Lancet Psychiatry and BJGP Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact