Jyotsna Gupta

23 papers receiving 301 citations

Peers

Jyotsna Gupta
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Reproductive Medicine 193
  • Gender Studies 119
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 63
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 55
  • Safety Research 16
Replace Amy Speier with:
Amy Speier United States
Michal Nahman United Kingdom
Isabel Karpin Australia
Diane Tober United States
Lauren Jade Martin United States
Daniela Cutas Sweden
Meg Stacey United States
Lisa Littman United States
Marjorie M. Shultz United States
Naara Luna Brazil
Jyotsna Gupta relative to Amy Speier United States Amy Speier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×
Amy Speier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jyotsna Gupta

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jyotsna Gupta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jyotsna Gupta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jyotsna Gupta more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jyotsna Gupta

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jyotsna Gupta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jyotsna Gupta. The network helps show where Jyotsna Gupta may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Jyotsna Gupta, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jyotsna Gupta Line = papers co-authored together Jyotsna Gupta links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200580
2 200854
3 201249
4
New Reproductive Technologies, Women′s Health and Autonomy: Freedom or Dependency?
200037
5 201022
6 202118
7 201314
8 200714
9 199313
10 201911
11 201111
12 20188
13 20227
14 20207
15 20126
16 20083
17 20113
18 20203
19 20222
20 20202

About Jyotsna Gupta

Jyotsna Gupta is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Gender Studies, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 25 papers that have together received 367 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Health and Technologies (7 papers), Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (6 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (3 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (2 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (2 papers), Online and Blended Learning (1 paper) and Innovations in Educational Methods (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (193 citations), Gender Studies (119 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (63 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (55 citations) and Safety Research (16 citations). Jyotsna Gupta has collaborated with scholars based in India, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Annemiek Richters, Atul Juneja, Mohua Maulik, Tulsi Adhikari, Arvind Pandey, Karen Lin‐Su, Saurabh Sharma, Abha Aggarwal, Ramesh Pandita and Elizabeth Mauer. Their work appears in journals such as Reproductive Health Matters, Culture Health & Sexuality, New Genetics and Society, BMC Endocrine Disorders and International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact