Jyotsna Gupta

22 papers receiving 266 citations

Peers

Jyotsna Gupta
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Reproductive Medicine 168
  • Gender Studies 105
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 67
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 60
  • Safety Research 15
Replace Amy Speier with:
Amy Speier United States
Daniela Cutas Sweden
Soraya Tremayne United Kingdom
Michal Nahman United Kingdom
Anne Donchin United States
Diane Tober United States
Isabel Karpin Australia
Lauren Jade Martin United States
Wendy Norton United Kingdom
Rachel Epstein Canada
Jyotsna Gupta relative to Amy Speier United States Amy Speier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Amy Speier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jyotsna Gupta

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jyotsna Gupta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jyotsna Gupta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jyotsna Gupta more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jyotsna Gupta

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jyotsna Gupta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jyotsna Gupta. The network helps show where Jyotsna Gupta may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Jyotsna Gupta, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jyotsna Gupta Line = papers co-authored together Jyotsna Gupta links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200569
2 200847
3 201243
4
New Reproductive Technologies, Women′s Health and Autonomy: Freedom or Dependency?
200030
5 202117
6 201015
7 201314
8 200713
9 199313
10 201110
11 20199
12 20207
13 20187
14 20126
15 20225
16 20114
17 20083
18 20203
19 20202
20 20221

About Jyotsna Gupta

Jyotsna Gupta is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Gender Studies, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Economics and Econometrics and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 24 papers that have together received 320 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Health and Technologies (7 papers), Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (6 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (3 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (3 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (2 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (2 papers) and Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (168 citations), Gender Studies (105 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (67 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (60 citations) and Safety Research (15 citations). Jyotsna Gupta has collaborated with scholars based in India, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Annemiek Richters, Atul Juneja, Mohua Maulik, Tulsi Adhikari, Karen Lin‐Su, Arvind Pandey, Saurabh Sharma, Abha Aggarwal, S D Seth and Marisa Censani. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Women s Studies, BMC Endocrine Disorders, International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, The Indian Journal of Medical Research and New Genetics and Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact