Daniela Cutas

641 citations
30 papers · 306 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Daniela Cutas

26 papers receiving 281 citations

Peers

Daniela Cutas
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Reproductive Medicine 124
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 60
  • Gender Studies 31
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 78
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 44
Replace Jyotsna Gupta with:
Jyotsna Gupta India
Isabel Karpin Australia
Aditya Bharadwaj Switzerland
Lauren Jade Martin United States
Tina Rulli United States
Nastasja M. de Graaf Netherlands
Zeynep B. Gürtin United Kingdom
Philip Kitcher United States
Jeremi M. Carswell United States
Ezio Di Nucci Denmark
Daniela Cutas relative to Jyotsna Gupta India Jyotsna Gupta's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Jyotsna Gupta · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Cutas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Cutas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Cutas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Cutas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Cutas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Cutas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Cutas. The network helps show where Daniela Cutas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Cutas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniela Cutas Line = papers co-authored together Daniela Cutas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201178
2 201238
3 201423
4 201517
5 201317
6 200716
7 201414
8 201614
9 200711
10 201111
11 201410
12 20138
13 20187
14 20097
15 20086
16 20175
17 20075
18 20054
19 20093
20
Introduction: perspectives on private and family life
20123

About Daniela Cutas

Daniela Cutas is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Cognitive Neuroscience and Molecular Biology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 306 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Health and Technologies (20 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (7 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (6 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (4 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (4 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (3 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (3 papers) and Organ Donation and Transplantation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (124 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (60 citations), Gender Studies (31 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (78 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (44 citations). Daniela Cutas has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United Kingdom and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Anna Smajdor, Lars Sandman, Christian Munthe, Sarah Chan, David Shaw, Kristien Hens, Wybo Dondorp, Guido de Wert, Tsjalling Swierstra and Sjoerd Repping. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Ethics, Health Care Analysis, Bioethics, Medicine Health Care and Philosophy and Journal of Applied Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact