Meg Stacey

15 total papers · 838 total citations
3 papers, 203 citations indexed

About

Meg Stacey is a scholar working on Pharmacy, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Meg Stacey has authored 3 papers receiving a total of 203 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 1 paper in Pharmacy, 0 papers in Infectious Diseases and 0 papers in Organic Chemistry. Recurrent topics in Meg Stacey’s work include Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (1 paper). Meg Stacey is often cited by papers focused on Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (1 paper). Meg Stacey collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom. Meg Stacey's co-authors include and and has published in prestigious journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Feminist Review and Journal of Law and Society.

In The Last Decade

No nodes

Meg Stacey

3 papers receiving 184 citations

Fields of papers citing papers by Meg Stacey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meg Stacey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meg Stacey. The network helps show where Meg Stacey may publish in the future.

Countries citing papers authored by Meg Stacey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meg Stacey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meg Stacey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meg Stacey more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026