J.W. Jones
Impact in
- Hematology top 5%
- Blood groups and transfusion
-
- Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology
Papers in
- Hematology 10
- Blood groups and transfusion 10
-
- Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology 6
- Co-authors
- Marion L. Scott (5 shared papers)D. Voak (5 shared papers)Neil D. Avent (4 shared papers)J. Bouma (2 shared papers)H.H. van Laar (2 shared papers)M.J. Kropff (2 shared papers)B.A.M. Bouman (2 shared papers)Belinda M. Kumpel (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Vox Sanguinis (5 papers)Blood (2 papers)Human Heredity (2 papers)Clinica Chimica Acta (2 papers)British Journal of Haematology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesPhilippines
In The Last Decade
J.W. Jones
17 papers receiving 372 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Hematology 240
- Physiology 129
- Genetics 48
- Agronomy and Crop Science 29
- Genetics 63
Countries citing papers authored by J.W. Jones
This map shows the geographic impact of J.W. Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.W. Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.W. Jones more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J.W. Jones
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.W. Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.W. Jones. The network helps show where J.W. Jones may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside J.W. Jones, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1997 | 89 | |
| 2 | 1998 | 73 | |
| 3 | 1995 | 67 | |
| 4 | 1997 | 45 | |
| 5 | 1996 | 30 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 14 | |
| 7 | 1997 | 14 | |
| 8 | 1995 | 13 | |
| 9 | 1987 | 12 | |
| 10 | 1990 | 10 | |
| 11 | 1995 | 9 | |
| 12 | Epitopes on Rh proteins. | 2000 | 7 |
| 13 | Applications of Systems Approaches at the Field Level, Volume 2. | 1997 | 6 |
| 14 | 1991 | 4 | |
| 15 | 1995 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1997 | 2 | |
| 17 | 1991 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1991 | 0 |
About J.W. Jones
J.W. Jones is a scholar working on Hematology, Physiology, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology and Genetics, having authored 18 papers that have together received 398 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Blood groups and transfusion (10 papers), Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology (6 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (4 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (3 papers), Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders (2 papers), Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (2 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (2 papers) and Blood disorders and treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hematology (240 citations), Physiology (129 citations), Genetics (48 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (29 citations) and Genetics (63 citations). J.W. Jones has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Philippines. Frequent co-authors include Marion L. Scott, D. Voak, Neil D. Avent, J. Bouma, H.H. van Laar, M.J. Kropff, B.A.M. Bouman, Belinda M. Kumpel, Paul Lloyd-Evans and Martin L. Olsson. Their work appears in journals such as Vox Sanguinis, Blood, Human Heredity, Clinica Chimica Acta and British Journal of Haematology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.