Júlia Wéber

50 papers receiving 818 citations

Peers

Júlia Wéber
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • Filtration and Separation 27
  • Biochemistry 53
  • Catalysis 59
  • Pharmaceutical Science 38
  • Cancer Research 69
Replace Rohit Arora with:
Rohit Arora India
Marta Teijeira Spain
Andrea Calcaterra Italy
Hu‐Ri Piao China
Nirup B. Mondal India
Farah Anjum Saudi Arabia
Vera Lúcia Eifler-Lima Brazil
Mona Salimi Iran
Iva Slaninová Czechia
Rita Calheiros Portugal
Júlia Wéber relative to Rohit Arora India Rohit Arora's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
Rohit Arora · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Júlia Wéber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Júlia Wéber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Júlia Wéber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Júlia Wéber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Júlia Wéber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Júlia Wéber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Júlia Wéber. The network helps show where Júlia Wéber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Júlia Wéber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Júlia Wéber Line = papers co-authored together Júlia Wéber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020132
2 201864
3 201453
4 201753
5 201549
6 201438
7 202234
8 201333
9 201132
10 201429
11 201326
12 201919
13 201218
14 201818
15 201918
16 201318
17 201817
18 201815
19 202315
20 201414

About Júlia Wéber

Júlia Wéber is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Organic Chemistry, Sociology and Political Science and Food Science, having authored 61 papers that have together received 840 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food (8 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (5 papers), Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (5 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (4 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (3 papers), Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (3 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (3 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Filtration and Separation (27 citations), Biochemistry (53 citations), Catalysis (59 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (38 citations) and Cancer Research (69 citations). Júlia Wéber has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Ewgenij Proschak, Cristiane de Bona da Silva, Tatiana Emanuelli, Fernando Dal Pont Morisso, Eliseu Rodrigues, Milene Teixeira Barcia, Franz Berthiller, Dariane Trivisiol da Silva, Vivian Caetano Bochi and Christian Hametner. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Organic Chemistry, Synlett, Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact