Michael Lotter

62 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Michael Lotter
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Otorhinolaryngology 177
  • Cancer Research 430
  • Radiation 242
  • Oncology 175
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 45
Replace José Luis Guinot with:
José Luis Guinot Spain
Zoltán Takácsi‐Nagy Hungary
J.J. Mazeron France
Talha Shaikh United States
Yeon‐Sil Kim South Korea
M. Hjelm-Hansen Denmark
Laura Lavinia Travaini Italy
Valentina Lancellotta Italy
C. Durdux France
Florian Würschmidt Germany
Michael Lotter relative to José Luis Guinot Spain José Luis Guinot's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
José Luis Guinot · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Lotter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Lotter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Lotter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Lotter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Lotter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Lotter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Lotter. The network helps show where Michael Lotter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Lotter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Lotter Line = papers co-authored together Michael Lotter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018119
2 2010101
3 2006100
4 201787
5 201067
6 201657
7 200447
8 200541
9 200439
10 200337
11 201734
12 200031
13 200730
14 201030
15 199429
16 201226
17 201523
18 200223
19 201323
20 200623

About Michael Lotter

Michael Lotter is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cancer Research, Otorhinolaryngology, Radiation and Oncology, having authored 69 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (14 papers), Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (10 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (9 papers), Head and Neck Cancer Studies (9 papers), Radiation Dose and Imaging (3 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (2 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (2 papers) and Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (177 citations), Cancer Research (430 citations), Radiation (242 citations), Oncology (175 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (45 citations). Michael Lotter has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Vratislav Strnad, Rainer Fietkau, Rolf Sauer, Stephan Kreppner, Oliver J. Ott, Richard Pötter, Christoph Bert, Guido Hildebrandt, J. Hammer and Alexandra Resch. Their work appears in journals such as Radiotherapy and Oncology, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, Brachytherapy, Zeitschrift für Medizinische Physik and International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact