Julia Roick

24 papers receiving 526 citations

Peers

Julia Roick
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 58
  • Otorhinolaryngology 17
  • Oncology 100
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 47
  • Social Psychology 66
Replace Claire Piccinin with:
Claire Piccinin Belgium
Mathilde G. E. Verdam Netherlands
Wendy Nelson United States
Georgios Papageorgiou Greece
P. Jansen South Africa
Dorte Malig Rasmussen Denmark
Feixue Wang China
Corey H. Brouse United States
Simon K. Dunne Ireland
Nuno Morais Portugal
Julia Roick relative to Claire Piccinin Belgium Claire Piccinin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.7×
Claire Piccinin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Roick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Roick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Roick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Roick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Roick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Roick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Roick. The network helps show where Julia Roick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Roick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Roick Line = papers co-authored together Julia Roick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017113
2 2021103
3 201867
4 201728
5 201727
6 201924
7 201921
8 201821
9 201920
10 201718
11 201615
12 201813
13 201613
14 20238
15 20197
16 20137
17 20216
18 20195
19 20214
20 20194

About Julia Roick

Julia Roick is a scholar working on Oncology, Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 26 papers that have together received 532 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer survivorship and care (7 papers), Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer (3 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers), Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation (2 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (2 papers), Health and Medical Studies (2 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (2 papers) and Multiple and Secondary Primary Cancers (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (58 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (17 citations), Oncology (100 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (47 citations) and Social Psychology (66 citations). Julia Roick has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Tobias Ringeisen, Michael Richter, Susanne Singer, Helge Danker, Jens Hoebel, Kirsten Papsdorf, Jacob Spallek, Olaf von dem Knesebeck, Andreas Dietz and Jürgen Meixensberger. Their work appears in journals such as Supportive Care in Cancer, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, International Journal of Educational Research and BMJ Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact