Julia Roberts

45 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Julia Roberts
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Research and Theory 131
  • Leadership and Management 50
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 43
  • General Health Professions 432
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 25
Replace Joanne Fitzpatrick with:
Joanne Fitzpatrick United Kingdom
Joanne Olson Canada
Zane Robinson Wolf United States
Pamela M. Ironside United States
Kerry Reid‐Searl Australia
Eileen Clark Australia
Åshild Slettebø Norway
Mohammad Ali Cheraghi Iran
Marianne Baernholdt United States
Alireza Nikbakht Nasrabadi Iran
Julia Roberts relative to Joanne Fitzpatrick United Kingdom Joanne Fitzpatrick's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Joanne Fitzpatrick · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Roberts

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Roberts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Roberts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Roberts more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Roberts

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Roberts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Roberts. The network helps show where Julia Roberts may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Julia Roberts, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Roberts Line = papers co-authored together Julia Roberts links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011332
2 2001133
3 2009133
4 200386
5 199976
6 200869
7 199663
8 200546
9 200343
10 201242
11 199237
12 200936
13 199232
14 200331
15 199730
16 201029
17 200527
18 199427
19 201327
20 199425

About Julia Roberts

Julia Roberts is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Education, Family Practice and Research and Theory, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (7 papers), Nursing education and management (6 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (6 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (5 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (5 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (4 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (4 papers) and Education and Critical Thinking Development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (131 citations), Leadership and Management (50 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (43 citations), General Health Professions (432 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (25 citations). Julia Roberts has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, India and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Joanne Fitzpatrick, Alison While, K. Louise Barriball, Jitna Por, Margaret J. Bull, Jacqueline Bloomfield, David Cowan, Mary Anne Tanay, Emma Ream and Freda Mold. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, International Journal of Nursing Studies, Nurse Education Today, Journal of Nursing Management and Age and Ageing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact