Julia Hocking

1.4k citations
32 papers · 1.0k · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Julia Hocking

29 papers receiving 999 citations

Peers

Julia Hocking
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 697
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 330
  • Sensory Systems 110
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 153
  • Social Psychology 170
Replace Johan Sandblom with:
Johan Sandblom Sweden
Chyrisse Heine Australia
Kara L. Bopp United States
Marilee Monnot United States
Erich J. Greene United States
A. Cris Hamilton United States
Sarah Sass United States
Sharon Flanagan Australia
Elaine Gurney United Kingdom
Diego E. Shalóm Argentina
Julia Hocking relative to Johan Sandblom Sweden Johan Sandblom's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
Johan Sandblom · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Hocking

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Hocking's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Hocking with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Hocking more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Hocking

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Hocking. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Hocking. The network helps show where Julia Hocking may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Hocking, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Hocking Line = papers co-authored together Julia Hocking links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006210
2 2007152
3 2015140
4 200897
5 200575
6 200966
7 200861
8 201750
9 200838
10 201532
11 201017
12 201614
13 201613
14 201610
15 20208
16 20147
17 20156
18 20176
19 20136
20 20086

About Julia Hocking

Julia Hocking is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, General Health Professions, Sensory Systems and Surgery, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multisensory perception and integration (9 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (5 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (5 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (4 papers), Categorization, perception, and language (4 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (3 papers) and Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (697 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (330 citations), Sensory Systems (110 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (153 citations) and Social Psychology (170 citations). Julia Hocking has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Cathy J. Price, C.J. Price, Uta Noppeney, Timothy T. Rogers, Andrea Mechelli, Karl Friston, Maria Luisa Gorno‐Tempini, Renata Meuter, Andrew G. Ryder and K. E. Patterson. Their work appears in journals such as Emergency Medicine Australasia, Cerebral Cortex, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, NeuroImage and Australasian Journal on Ageing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact