Julia Durek
Impact in
- Biotechnology top 10%
- Microbial Inactivation Methods
- Animal Science and Zoology top 10%
- Meat and Animal Product Quality
Papers in
-
- Meat and Animal Product Quality 4
-
- Plasma Applications and Diagnostics 4
- Co-authors
- Oliver Schlüter (12 shared papers)Antje Fröhling (9 shared papers)Jörg Ehlbeck (3 shared papers)Uta Schnabel (1 shared paper)Sara Bußler (4 shared papers)Pawel Durek (2 shared papers)Dietrich Knorr (2 shared papers)Fredi Schwägele (2 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Julia Durek
13 papers receiving 282 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Biotechnology 63
- Animal Science and Zoology 70
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 135
- Analytical Chemistry 38
- Insect Science 47
Countries citing papers authored by Julia Durek
This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Durek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Durek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Durek more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Durek
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Durek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Durek. The network helps show where Julia Durek may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Durek, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 123 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 28 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 28 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 26 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 16 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 15 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 12 | Minimal processing in automatisierten Prozessketten der Fleischverarbeitung : eine Fallstudie am Beispiel der Feinzerlegung von Schweinefleisch (Schinken) | 2011 | 1 |
| 13 | INSECTA 2019 International Conference: book of abstracts | 2019 | 1 |
About Julia Durek
Julia Durek is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Biotechnology, Genetics and Insect Science, having authored 13 papers that have together received 289 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meat and Animal Product Quality (4 papers), Plasma Applications and Diagnostics (4 papers), Insect Utilization and Effects (3 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (3 papers), Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety (3 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (2 papers), Bee Products Chemical Analysis (2 papers) and Biosensors and Analytical Detection (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (63 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (70 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (135 citations), Analytical Chemistry (38 citations) and Insect Science (47 citations). Julia Durek has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Italy and Malta. Frequent co-authors include Oliver Schlüter, Antje Fröhling, Jörg Ehlbeck, Uta Schnabel, Sara Bußler, Pawel Durek, Dietrich Knorr, Fredi Schwägele, Shikha Ojha and G Rossi. Their work appears in journals such as Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, Meat Science, Frontiers in Microbiology, Scientific Reports and Food and Bioprocess Technology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.