Julia A.C. Case

492 citations
18 papers · 343 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Julia A.C. Case

18 papers receiving 335 citations

Peers

Julia A.C. Case
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Biological Psychiatry 89
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 45
  • Clinical Psychology 127
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 69
  • Applied Psychology 16
Replace Glenn S. Hirsch with:
Glenn S. Hirsch United States
Matthis Wankerl Germany
Elana M. Hoffman United States
Dahlia Mukherjee United States
Christine Macare United Kingdom
Tse Choo United States
Joana Straub Germany
Amy Johnson United Kingdom
Philip A. Spechler United States
Yara J. Toenders Netherlands
Julia A.C. Case relative to Glenn S. Hirsch United States Glenn S. Hirsch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
Glenn S. Hirsch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia A.C. Case

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia A.C. Case's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia A.C. Case with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia A.C. Case more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia A.C. Case

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia A.C. Case. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia A.C. Case. The network helps show where Julia A.C. Case may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia A.C. Case, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia A.C. Case Line = papers co-authored together Julia A.C. Case links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 201593
2 202056
3 201940
4 201630
5 201622
6 202120
7 202018
8 202014
9 20219
10 20218
11 20207
12 20236
13 20215
14 20235
15 20204
16 20163
17 20202
18 20201

About Julia A.C. Case

Julia A.C. Case is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience and Social Psychology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 343 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (5 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (4 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (2 papers) and Stress Responses and Cortisol (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (89 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (45 citations), Clinical Psychology (127 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (69 citations) and Applied Psychology (16 citations). Julia A.C. Case has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Thomas M. Olino, Vilma Gabbay, Kailyn Bradley, Omar Khan, Carmen Alonso, Melissa S. Xanthopoulos, Christina L. Master, Tami D. Benton, Lauren B. Alloy and David M. Siegel. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Individual Differences, Journal of Affective Disorders, Assessment, Journal of Anxiety Disorders and European Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact