Judith Redfern

14 papers receiving 808 citations

Judith Redfern's Hit Papers

Self-Reported Long-Term Needs After Stroke 2011 · 364 citations
3640+5+10Years since publication100200300

Peers

Judith Redfern
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Rehabilitation 335
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 77
  • Epidemiology 169
  • Medical Terminology 1
  • General Health Professions 90
Replace Erin Lalor with:
Erin Lalor Australia
Ton Satink Netherlands
Michael J. McCarthy United States
Janet A. Prvu-Bettger United States
Sally Eames Australia
Kate Howie United Kingdom
Sandra Horn Germany
Eithne Sexton Ireland
Lesley Brown United Kingdom
Kim Juul Larsen Denmark
Judith Redfern relative to Erin Lalor Australia Erin Lalor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Erin Lalor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Judith Redfern

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Judith Redfern's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Judith Redfern with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Judith Redfern more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Judith Redfern

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Judith Redfern. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Judith Redfern. The network helps show where Judith Redfern may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Judith Redfern, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Judith Redfern Line = papers co-authored together Judith Redfern links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1
Self-Reported Long-Term Needs After Stroke
Hit paper breakdown →
2011364
2 200682
3 200077
4 201568
5 201060
6 200843
7
The process of outpatient referral and care: the experiences and views of patients, their general practitioners, and specialists.
200042
8 200823
9
The Stroke Association UK Stroke Survivor Needs Survey: Final Report , 2010.
201023
10 200622
11 200121
12 200015
13 20191
14 20231

About Judith Redfern

Judith Redfern is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, General Health Professions, Epidemiology and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 14 papers that have together received 842 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (4 papers), Healthcare Systems and Technology (2 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (1 paper), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (1 paper), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (1 paper), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (1 paper), Healthcare Policy and Management (1 paper) and Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (335 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (77 citations), Epidemiology (169 citations), Medical Terminology (1 citation) and General Health Professions (90 citations). Judith Redfern has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Qatar and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Charles D.A. Wolfe, Christopher McKevitt, Siobhan L. Crichton, Nina Fudge, Anita Sheldenkar, Anne Förster, Louise E. Silver, Peter Malcolm Rothwell, Irwin Nazareth and John B. Young. Their work appears in journals such as Stroke, Implementation Science, Health & Place, Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases and Age and Ageing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact