Judith Redfern

1.3k citations
16 papers · 1.0k · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Judith Redfern

16 papers receiving 977 citations

Peers

Judith Redfern
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Rehabilitation 447
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 101
  • Epidemiology 192
  • Family Practice 9
  • General Health Professions 111
Replace Laurie Plue with:
Laurie Plue United States
Gale Robinson-Smith United States
Kyler M. Godwin United States
Ton Satink Netherlands
Erin Lalor Australia
Dawn M. Aycock United States
Kathleen Potempa United States
Theodore Tsaousides United States
Monique R. Pappadis United States
E Hamrin Sweden
Judith Redfern relative to Laurie Plue United States Laurie Plue's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Laurie Plue · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Judith Redfern

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Judith Redfern's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Judith Redfern with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Judith Redfern more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Judith Redfern

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Judith Redfern. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Judith Redfern. The network helps show where Judith Redfern may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Judith Redfern, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Judith Redfern Line = papers co-authored together Judith Redfern links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2011346
2 2004196
3 200682
4 200072
5 201561
6 201059
7
The process of outpatient referral and care: the experiences and views of patients, their general practitioners, and specialists.
200043
8 200839
9 200822
10 200622
11
The Stroke Association UK Stroke Survivor Needs Survey: Final Report , 2010.
201021
12 200120
13 200016
14
Best Practices in the Behavioral Management of Chronic Disease
200315
15 20191
16 20231

About Judith Redfern

Judith Redfern is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, General Health Professions, Epidemiology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 16 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (4 papers), Healthcare Systems and Technology (2 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (1 paper), Patient Dignity and Privacy (1 paper), Healthcare Policy and Management (1 paper), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (1 paper), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (1 paper) and Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (447 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (101 citations), Epidemiology (192 citations), Family Practice (9 citations) and General Health Professions (111 citations). Judith Redfern has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Qatar and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Charles Wolfe, Christopher McKevitt, Freda Mold, Anita Sheldenkar, Nina Fudge, Siobhan Crichton, Ann Bowling, L E Silver, Peter M. Rothwell and Anne Förster. Their work appears in journals such as Stroke, Patient Education and Counseling, Health Risk & Society, Implementation Science and Health & Place.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact