Eithne Sexton

35 papers receiving 732 citations

Peers

Eithne Sexton
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 54
  • Rehabilitation 102
  • Health 74
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 23
  • Neurology 53
Replace Mei‐Ju Chi with:
Mei‐Ju Chi Taiwan
Renata Sousa United Kingdom
Robert A. Fieo United States
Teiji Sakagami Japan
Conor Cunningham United Kingdom
Sarah C. Marshall United States
Taiji Noguchi Japan
Anne Stark Germany
Marina Calvo Rodríguez Cuba
Helena Hörder Sweden
Eithne Sexton relative to Mei‐Ju Chi Taiwan Mei‐Ju Chi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.9×
Mei‐Ju Chi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eithne Sexton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eithne Sexton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eithne Sexton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eithne Sexton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eithne Sexton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eithne Sexton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eithne Sexton. The network helps show where Eithne Sexton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eithne Sexton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eithne Sexton Line = papers co-authored together Eithne Sexton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019182
2 201491
3 201372
4 201960
5 201354
6 201139
7 201128
8
Measurement Properties of PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Short Forms in a Large, Ethnically Diverse Cancer Cohort
201626
9 201424
10 201424
11 201618
12 201315
13 201812
14 201512
15 202010
16 20209
17 20189
18 20168
19 20247
20 20176

About Eithne Sexton

Eithne Sexton is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Psychiatry and Mental health, General Health Professions, Epidemiology and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 36 papers that have together received 745 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (7 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (6 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (6 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (4 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (3 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (54 citations), Rehabilitation (102 citations), Health (74 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (23 citations) and Neurology (53 citations). Eithne Sexton has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Anne Marie Hickey, Bellinda L. King‐Kallimanis, Richard Layte, Kathleen Bennett, Niamh A. Merriman, Maev‐Ann Wren, David James Williams, Nora-Ann Donnelly, Hannah M. McGee and Daniela Rohde. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, Age and Ageing, Quality of Life Research, Disability and Rehabilitation and Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact