Judith Cole
Impact in
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 10%
- Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Papers in
-
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology 2
-
- Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare 1
- Co-authors
- Margaret Cupples (5 shared papers)Nigel Hart (4 shared papers)Mark A. Tully (2 shared papers)Susan M. Smith (3 shared papers)Eric S. Johnson (1 shared paper)Jeanne Loughlin (1 shared paper)Kenneth J. Rothman (1 shared paper)Kathrin Kaufhold (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2 papers)BMC Family Practice (1 paper)Cardiology Research and Practice (1 paper)The Lancet Regional Health - Europe (1 paper)Spine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIrelandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Judith Cole
16 papers receiving 335 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 36
- Family Practice 9
- Physiology 53
- Applied Psychology 8
- Rheumatology 23
Countries citing papers authored by Judith Cole
This map shows the geographic impact of Judith Cole's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Judith Cole with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Judith Cole more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Judith Cole
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Judith Cole. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Judith Cole. The network helps show where Judith Cole may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Judith Cole, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 53 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 52 | |
| 3 | How Prepared are UK Medical Graduates for Practice? Final report from a programme of research commissioned by the General Medical Council | 2014 | 45 |
| 4 | 2010 | 43 | |
| 5 | 2002 | 30 | |
| 6 | 1989 | 28 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 28 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 22 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 14 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2026 | 2 | |
| 14 | Evaluation of past and present implementation of Telemonitoring NI | 2016 | 2 |
| 15 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2023 | 1 |
About Judith Cole
Judith Cole is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, General Health Professions, Rheumatology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Urology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 342 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (2 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (1 paper), Antibiotic Use and Resistance (1 paper), Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms (1 paper), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (1 paper), Cancer Risks and Factors (1 paper), Health and Medical Research Impacts (1 paper) and Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (36 citations), Family Practice (9 citations), Physiology (53 citations), Applied Psychology (8 citations) and Rheumatology (23 citations). Judith Cole has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Margaret Cupples, Nigel Hart, Mark A. Tully, Susan M. Smith, Eric S. Johnson, Jeanne Loughlin, Kenneth J. Rothman, Kathrin Kaufhold, Karen Mattick and Charlotte E. Rees. Their work appears in journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, BMC Family Practice, Cardiology Research and Practice, The Lancet Regional Health - Europe and Spine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.