Josh Packard
Impact in
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Participatory Visual Research Methods
- Children's Rights and Participation
- Religion and Society Interactions
- Religion, Society, and Development
- Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
-
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Papers in
-
- Religion, Society, and Development 5
- Religion and Society Interactions 5
- Critical Race Theory in Education 2
- Sport and Mega-Event Impacts 1
- Participatory Visual Research Methods 1
- Health 3
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology 3
- Co-authors
- Richard Pitt (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Visual Studies (1 paper)Journal of Contemporary Religion (1 paper)Sociological Quarterly (1 paper)Sociological Inquiry (1 paper)Sociological Perspectives (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Josh Packard
13 papers receiving 286 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Sociology and Political Science 247
- Health 39
- Geography, Planning and Development 19
- Conservation 9
- Museology 9
Countries citing papers authored by Josh Packard
This map shows the geographic impact of Josh Packard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Josh Packard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Josh Packard more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Josh Packard
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Josh Packard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Josh Packard. The network helps show where Josh Packard may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 1 scholars most cited alongside Josh Packard, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 214 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 21 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 18 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 16 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 13 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 1 | |
| 13 | Exploratory analysis of patients' motivations to quit smoking and participate in smoking cessation classes. | 2013 | 1 |
| 14 | 2016 | 1 |
About Josh Packard
Josh Packard is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Health, Education, General Health Professions and Religious studies, having authored 14 papers that have together received 324 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion, Society, and Development (5 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (5 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (3 papers), Higher Education Research Studies (3 papers), Critical Race Theory in Education (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (1 paper) and Participatory Visual Research Methods (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (247 citations), Health (39 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (19 citations), Conservation (9 citations) and Museology (9 citations). Josh Packard has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Richard Pitt. Their work appears in journals such as Visual Studies, Journal of Contemporary Religion, Sociological Quarterly, Sociological Inquiry and Sociological Perspectives.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.