Joseph Viscomi

495 citations
23 papers · 229 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Joseph Viscomi

16 papers receiving 79 citations

Peers

Joseph Viscomi
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Literature and Literary Theory 138
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 47
  • Museology 26
  • History 70
  • Music 20
Replace Douglas Bruster with:
Douglas Bruster United States
Valentine Cunningham United Kingdom
Albert Gelpí United States
George Bornstein United States
Felicia McCarren United States
Barbara Becker‐Cantarino United States
Tricia Lootens United States
William Makepeace Thackeray United Kingdom
Jan Marsh
Ivo Kamps United States
Joseph Viscomi relative to Douglas Bruster United States Douglas Bruster's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Douglas Bruster · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joseph Viscomi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph Viscomi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph Viscomi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph Viscomi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph Viscomi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph Viscomi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph Viscomi. The network helps show where Joseph Viscomi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Joseph Viscomi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joseph Viscomi Line = papers co-authored together Joseph Viscomi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198687
2
Blake and the idea of the book
199381
3 20029
4 20029
5 19958
6
The early illuminated books
19987
7
Milton a Poem, and the Final Illuminated Works: The Ghost of Abel, on Homers Poetry, [And] on Virgil Laocoon
19786
8 20025
9 19993
10 20033
11 20182
12 19982
13 20062
14 20181
15 19821
16 20181
17 19991
18 20071
19 20190
20 19980

About Joseph Viscomi

Joseph Viscomi is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, History, Classics and Museology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 229 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Moravian Church and William Blake (17 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (5 papers), Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (3 papers), Medieval Literature and History (1 paper), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (1 paper), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (1 paper), Historical Art and Culture Studies (1 paper) and Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (138 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (47 citations), Museology (26 citations), History (70 citations) and Music (20 citations). Joseph Viscomi has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Martin Meisel, Robert N. Essick, Morris Eaves, William Blake, Kari Kraus, Joseph Fletcher, Michael Fox, Raymond Lister and Matthew Kirschenbaum. Their work appears in journals such as The Wordsworth Circle, Studies in Romanticism, Huntington Library Quarterly, Romanticism on the Net and Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact