Douglas Bruster

959 citations
25 papers · 127 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Douglas Bruster

16 papers receiving 74 citations

Peers

Douglas Bruster
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Literature and Literary Theory 70
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 22
  • Museology 14
  • Classics 14
  • History 26
Replace James C. Bulman with:
James C. Bulman United Kingdom
Henry S. Turner United States
Maurice Hunt United States
Ronald Knowles United Kingdom
Kenneth Gross United States
Lawrence Lipking United States
Gordon Teskey United States
Loïs Potter United States
Scott McMillin United States
Alfred Tennyson Tennyson
Douglas Bruster relative to James C. Bulman United Kingdom James C. Bulman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
James C. Bulman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Douglas Bruster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Douglas Bruster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Douglas Bruster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Douglas Bruster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Douglas Bruster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Douglas Bruster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Douglas Bruster. The network helps show where Douglas Bruster may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Douglas Bruster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Douglas Bruster Line = papers co-authored together Douglas Bruster links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199228
2 200315
3
Quoting Shakespeare: Form and Culture in Early Modern Drama
200014
4 20149
5 20088
6 20048
7
Prologues to Shakespeare's Theatre: Performance and Liminality in Early Modern Drama
20048
8
In the company of Shakespeare : essays on English Renaissance literature in honor of G. Blakemore Evans
20046
9
Come to the Tent Again: "The Passionate Shepherd," Dramatic Rape and Lyric Time
19915
10 20135
11 20135
12 19923
13
Shakespeare and the Question of Culture: Early Modern Literature and the Cultural Turn
20173
14 20152
15 19952
16 19902
17 19901
18 20151
19 19901
20
Everyman and Mankind
20091

About Douglas Bruster

Douglas Bruster is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Classics, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Sociology and Political Science and Museology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 127 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (12 papers), Renaissance Literature and Culture (4 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (3 papers), Philippine History and Culture (3 papers), Linguistic Variation and Morphology (2 papers), South Asian Cinema and Culture (2 papers), Theatre and Performance Studies (2 papers) and Authorship Attribution and Profiling (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (70 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (22 citations), Museology (14 citations), Classics (14 citations) and History (26 citations). Douglas Bruster has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert Weimann, G.K. Smith, Joseph Candido and Eric Rasmussen. Their work appears in journals such as Shakespeare Quarterly, Renaissance Drama, Comparative drama, Modern Drama and Studies in English Literature 1500-1900.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact