Jörg Budde

15 papers receiving 220 citations

Peers

Jörg Budde
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Management Information Systems 49
  • Safety Research 37
  • Accounting 44
  • General Decision Sciences 6
  • Genetics 19
Replace Andrew Grant with:
Andrew Grant Australia
Alessandra Chirco Italy
Martín Richter Germany
José María de las Heras Montes Uruguay
Paolo Pellizzari Italy
Donald J. McGuire United States
Toshihiro Nishiguchi Japan
Jieun Son United States
Andrew Bird United States
Pierre Chaigneau Canada
Jörg Budde relative to Andrew Grant Australia Andrew Grant's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×18.5×
Andrew Grant · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jörg Budde

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jörg Budde's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jörg Budde with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jörg Budde more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jörg Budde

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jörg Budde. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jörg Budde. The network helps show where Jörg Budde may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Jörg Budde, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jörg Budde Line = papers co-authored together Jörg Budde links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 1999130
2 200761
3 20099
4 19986
5 20105
6 20085
7 19984
8 19972
9
Variance Analysis as an Incentive Device when Payments are Based on Rank Order
19991
10 20231
11 20001
12 20231
13 20111
14
Effizienz betrieblicher Informationssysteme : Vergleich unter Anreizaspekten
20001
15 19991

About Jörg Budde

Jörg Budde is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Economics and Econometrics, Safety Research, Strategy and Management and Management Information Systems, having authored 15 papers that have together received 229 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Auction Theory and Applications (10 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (7 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (5 papers), Supply Chain and Inventory Management (2 papers), Public Procurement and Policy (2 papers), Insurance and Financial Risk Management (1 paper), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (1 paper) and Corporate Finance and Governance (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (49 citations), Safety Research (37 citations), Accounting (44 citations), General Decision Sciences (6 citations) and Genetics (19 citations). Jörg Budde has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Thiébaut-Noël Willig, E. Kohne, S. Blanche, Jean‐Louis Stephan, Guy Cornu, Pierre Bordigoni, Thierry Leblanc, Christian Tiemann, Robert Girot and Charlotte Niemeyer. Their work appears in journals such as Management Accounting Research, Journal of Mathematical Economics, Journal of Economics, Pediatric Research and Journal of Accounting Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact