Countries where authors publish in The Accounting Review
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Accounting Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Accounting Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Accounting Review more than expected).
Fields of papers published in The Accounting Review
This network shows the impact of papers published in The Accounting Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Accounting Review.
About The Accounting Review
The 2.4k papers published in The Accounting Review in the last decades have received a total of 244.1k indexed citations . Papers published in The Accounting Review usually cover Accounting (1.8k papers), Finance (766 papers), General Decision Sciences (117 papers), Strategy and Management (587 papers) and Safety Research (209 papers) specifically the topics of Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (1.5k papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (954 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (643 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (500 papers), Corporate Taxation and Avoidance (239 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (208 papers), Accounting and Organizational Management (159 papers) and Taxation and Compliance Studies (148 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Accounting Review are Richard G. Sloan, Patricia Dechow, Christine A. Botosan, Ross L. Watts, Ilia D. Dichev, Jerold L. Zimmerman, Maureen F. McNichols, Jere R. Francis, Dawn A. Matsumoto and Mary E. Barth.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.