The Accounting Review

1.9k papers and 197.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.9k papers published in The Accounting Review in the last decades have received a total of 197.2k indexed citations. Papers published in The Accounting Review usually cover Accounting (1.6k papers), Finance (713 papers) and Strategy and Management (527 papers) specifically the topics of Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (1.4k papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (928 papers) and Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (606 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Accounting Review are Richard G. Sloan, Patricia Dechow, Ilia D. Dichev, Dawn A. Matsumoto, Jere R. Francis, Michelle Hanlon, Maureen F. McNichols, Peter D. Easton, Ryan LaFond and Sarah E. McVay.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Accounting Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Accounting Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Accounting Review.

Countries where authors publish in The Accounting Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Accounting Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Accounting Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Accounting Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025