Jonathan Proctor
Impact in
- Modeling and Simulation top 5%
- COVID-19 epidemiological studies
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Climate Change and Geoengineering
- Climate variability and models
- Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
- COVID-19 impact on air quality
Papers in
-
- Climate change impacts on agriculture 5
-
- Climate variability and models 1
- Co-authors
- Peter Huybers (7 shared papers)Tamma A. Carleton (4 shared papers)Marshall Burke (2 shared papers)Jennifer Anne Burney (2 shared papers)Solomon Hsiang (3 shared papers)Wolfram Schlenker (1 shared paper)Kyle C. Meng (1 shared paper)Duo Chan (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Nature Communications (3 papers)Nature Food (3 papers)Science Advances (2 papers)Remote Sensing (1 paper)Nature (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Jonathan Proctor
13 papers receiving 366 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Modeling and Simulation 63
- Global and Planetary Change 145
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 69
- Horticulture 2
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 25
Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Proctor
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Proctor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Proctor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Proctor more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Proctor
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Proctor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Proctor. The network helps show where Jonathan Proctor may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Proctor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 114 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 111 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 63 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 29 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 14 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2025 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2025 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2025 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 15 | 2026 | 0 | |
| 16 | 2026 | 0 |
About Jonathan Proctor
Jonathan Proctor is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Atmospheric Science and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 16 papers that have together received 381 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Climate change impacts on agriculture (5 papers), Remote Sensing in Agriculture (3 papers), Climate Change Policy and Economics (2 papers), Remote Sensing and Land Use (1 paper), Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (1 paper), Climate variability and models (1 paper), Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration (1 paper) and Income, Poverty, and Inequality (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (63 citations), Global and Planetary Change (145 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (69 citations), Horticulture (2 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (25 citations). Jonathan Proctor has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Peter Huybers, Tamma A. Carleton, Marshall Burke, Jennifer Anne Burney, Solomon Hsiang, Wolfram Schlenker, Kyle C. Meng, Duo Chan, A. J. Rigden and Geeta G. Persad. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, Nature Food, Science Advances, Remote Sensing and Nature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.