Jonathan Mitchell

703 citations
43 papers · 323 · h-index 10

Impact in

  • Philosophy top 5%
    • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
    • Emotions and Moral Behavior

Papers in

Jonathan Mitchell

38 papers receiving 291 citations

Peers

Jonathan Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Philosophy 78
  • Social Psychology 110
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 93
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 14
  • Ecological Modeling 18
Replace Jeff Sebo with:
Jeff Sebo United States
Allison Williams United States
Charles Goodman United States
Christopher Belshaw United Kingdom
GW Smith United States
Albert W. Musschenga Netherlands
Michael Crouch United States
Ben Bramble Austria
Eden Lin United States
G. K. D. Crozier Canada
Jonathan Mitchell relative to Jeff Sebo United States Jeff Sebo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jeff Sebo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Mitchell. The network helps show where Jonathan Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200753
2 201534
3 201724
4 202121
5 201818
6 201716
7 201915
8 197312
9 201211
10 202210
11 20219
12 20189
13 20159
14 20088
15 20197
16 20027
17 20196
18 20206
19 20196
20 20195

About Jonathan Mitchell

Jonathan Mitchell is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 43 papers that have together received 323 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Emotions and Moral Behavior (19 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (15 papers), Embodied and Extended Cognition (5 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (4 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (4 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 papers), Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (3 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (78 citations), Social Psychology (110 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (93 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (14 citations) and Ecological Modeling (18 citations). Jonathan Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Francis C. Golet, Peter W. C. Paton, Ariella Lang, Kimberly D. Fraser, Eddy Lang, Neil J. MacKinnon, Patrícia Marck, Geneviève L. Lavigne, Melissa Griffin and Mélanie Lavoie‐Tremblay. Their work appears in journals such as Synthese, Inquiry, European Journal of Philosophy, The Philosophical Quarterly and Philosophical Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact