Amit Malik

44 papers receiving 521 citations

Peers

Amit Malik
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Family Practice 26
  • Social Psychology 112
  • General Health Professions 103
  • Health Information Management 19
  • Ecological Modeling 17
Replace Jean‐Guy Blais with:
Jean‐Guy Blais Canada
Alexander Smith Switzerland
Ruth J. Cronje United States
Anne Seymour United States
Annette L. Valenta United States
Campbell United States
Serkan Toy United States
Katrina J. Serrano United States
P. T. Davies Netherlands
Carlos Jesús Canova-Barrios Argentina
Amit Malik relative to Jean‐Guy Blais Canada Jean‐Guy Blais's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.5×
Jean‐Guy Blais · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amit Malik

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amit Malik's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amit Malik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amit Malik more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amit Malik

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amit Malik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amit Malik. The network helps show where Amit Malik may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amit Malik, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amit Malik Line = papers co-authored together Amit Malik links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201489
2 202173
3 202236
4 201332
5 202331
6 201028
7 201327
8 201025
9
Factors influencing French medical students towards a career in psychiatry.
201219
10 200816
11 200815
12 200813
13 201313
14
Workplace-based assessments in psychiatry
200713
15 200712
16
FORMAL METHODS: BENEFITS, CHALLENGES AND FUTURE DIRECTION
201311
17 200910
18 20109
19 20069
20 20139

About Amit Malik

Amit Malik is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Social Psychology and Information Systems, having authored 46 papers that have together received 558 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (10 papers), Child and Adolescent Health (7 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (6 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (5 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (4 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (4 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (4 papers) and Psychiatric care and mental health services (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (26 citations), Social Psychology (112 citations), General Health Professions (103 citations), Health Information Management (19 citations) and Ecological Modeling (17 citations). Amit Malik has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, India and United States. Frequent co-authors include Dinesh Bhugra, Gregory Lydall, Çlare Oakley, Surjeet Dalal, Edeh Michael Onyema, David M. Ndetei, Varadharajan Sridhar, Monica Adya, Martina Rojnić Kuzman and Alexander Nawka. Their work appears in journals such as International Review of Psychiatry, European Psychiatry, International Journal of Social Psychiatry, Journal of Organizational and End User Computing and Academic Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact