Jonathan Ling
Impact in
- Toxicology top 0.2%
- Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
- Human-Computer Interaction top 1%
- Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Papers in
-
- Cognitive Functions and Memory 14
- Health 18
- Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy 15
- Co-authors
- Paul van Schaik (22 shared papers)Thomas Heffernan (26 shared papers)Andrew B Scholey (17 shared papers)Jacqui Rodgers (16 shared papers)Tom Buchanan (15 shared papers)Steven Muncer (3 shared papers)Andrew C. Parrott (12 shared papers)Walid A. Al-Qerem (27 shared papers)
- Journals
- PLoS ONE (7 papers)Human Psychopharmacology Clinical and Experimental (5 papers)Vaccines (5 papers)International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (4 papers)Interacting with Computers (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomJordanNigeria
In The Last Decade
Jonathan Ling
203 papers receiving 4.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 188
- Toxicology 442
- Human-Computer Interaction 385
- Health Informatics 91
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 536
- Health 277
Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Ling
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Ling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Ling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Ling more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Ling
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Ling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Ling. The network helps show where Jonathan Ling may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Ling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 210 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 219 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 159 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 156 | |
| 4 | 2002 | 135 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 127 | |
| 6 | 2004 | 126 | |
| 7 | 2002 | 107 | |
| 8 | 2001 | 98 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 94 | |
| 10 | 2001 | 93 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 88 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 86 | |
| 13 | 2005 | 86 | |
| 14 | 2005 | 82 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 81 | |
| 16 | 2024 | 78 | |
| 17 | 2003 | 70 | |
| 18 | 2008 | 69 | |
| 19 | 2014 | 68 | |
| 20 | 2010 | 63 |
About Jonathan Ling
Jonathan Ling is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Health, Human-Computer Interaction, Toxicology and General Health Professions, having authored 210 papers that have together received 4.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (15 papers), Cognitive Functions and Memory (14 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (13 papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (11 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (11 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (10 papers), Color perception and design (8 papers) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (442 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (385 citations), Health Informatics (91 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (536 citations) and Health (277 citations). Jonathan Ling has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Jordan and Nigeria. Frequent co-authors include Paul van Schaik, Thomas Heffernan, Andrew B Scholey, Jacqui Rodgers, Tom Buchanan, Steven Muncer, Andrew C. Parrott, Walid A. Al-Qerem, David Bamidele Olawade and Judith Eberhardt. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Human Psychopharmacology Clinical and Experimental, Vaccines, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies and Interacting with Computers.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.