Jonathan J. Herrera

14 papers receiving 619 citations

Peers

Jonathan J. Herrera
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Aging 26
  • Biological Psychiatry 28
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 36
  • Physiology 216
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 185
Replace Marco Fabrício Dias‐Peixoto with:
Marco Fabrício Dias‐Peixoto Brazil
Aaron L. Slusher United States
Kawai So United States
Petter S. Alm Sweden
Kayvan Khoramipour Iran
Michael A. Kiràly Canada
Jialin Fu China
Khadijeh Mirzaei Iran
Hamed Alizadeh Pahlavani Iran
Ferenc Torma Hungary
Jonathan J. Herrera relative to Marco Fabrício Dias‐Peixoto Brazil Marco Fabrício Dias‐Peixoto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Marco Fabrício Dias‐Peixoto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan J. Herrera

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan J. Herrera's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan J. Herrera with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan J. Herrera more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan J. Herrera

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan J. Herrera. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan J. Herrera. The network helps show where Jonathan J. Herrera may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan J. Herrera, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan J. Herrera Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan J. Herrera links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2015157
2 2017153
3 201779
4 201656
5 201934
6 202032
7 201932
8 202224
9 201423
10 202018
11 202211
12 19908
13 20242
14 20111

About Jonathan J. Herrera

Jonathan J. Herrera is a scholar working on Physiology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Molecular Biology, Aging and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 14 papers that have together received 630 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (7 papers), Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (3 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (2 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (2 papers), Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise (2 papers), Exercise and Physiological Responses (2 papers), Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies (2 papers) and Diet and metabolism studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (26 citations), Biological Psychiatry (28 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (36 citations), Physiology (216 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (185 citations). Jonathan J. Herrera has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Chile. Frequent co-authors include Monika Fleshner, Agnieszka Mika, Rob Knight, Antonio González, Will Van Treuren, Sharlene M. Day, Anil Attili, Matthew T. Wheeler, Maryann Concannon and Jonathan Myers. Their work appears in journals such as Muscle & Nerve, Brain Behavior and Immunity, JAMA, The Journals of Gerontology Series A and Water Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact