Jon Opie

569 citations
25 papers · 371 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Jon Opie

24 papers receiving 312 citations

Peers

Jon Opie
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 272
  • History and Philosophy of Science 54
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 102
  • Social Psychology 90
  • Philosophy 42
Replace Gerard O’Brien with:
Gerard O’Brien Australia
Mario Villalobos Chile
Josefa Toribio Spain
Pete Mandik United States
Austen Clark United States
Corey J. Maley United States
Wanja Wiese Germany
Daniel C. Burnston United States
Kenneth Williford United States
Sara Bizarro Portugal
Jon Opie relative to Gerard O’Brien Australia Gerard O’Brien's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Gerard O’Brien · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jon Opie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jon Opie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jon Opie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jon Opie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jon Opie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jon Opie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jon Opie. The network helps show where Jon Opie may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Jon Opie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jon Opie Line = papers co-authored together Jon Opie links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999102
2 200476
3 200528
4 199824
5 200821
6 200218
7 199717
8 199915
9
Connectionist vehicles, structural resemblance, and the phenomenal mind
200113
10 201513
11 20038
12 20008
13
Gestalt theories of cognitive representation and processing
19995
14 19995
15
Connectionist modelling strategies
19983
16
Representation in Analog Computation
20113
17 20012
18 20022
19 20152
20
Vehicles of consciousness
20091

About Jon Opie

Jon Opie is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Social Psychology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 371 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Embodied and Extended Cognition (12 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (9 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (6 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (4 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (3 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (2 papers), Plant and Biological Electrophysiology Studies (2 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (272 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (54 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (102 citations), Social Psychology (90 citations) and Philosophy (42 citations). Jon Opie has collaborated with scholars based in Australia. Frequent co-authors include Gerard O’Brien, Gerard O’Brien and Pamela Lyon. Their work appears in journals such as Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Philosophia and Language & Communication.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact