Jon Grahe

3.0k citations
48 papers · 1.1k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Jon Grahe

44 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Jon Grahe
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Social Psychology 550
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 218
  • Applied Psychology 76
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 77
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 15
Replace Lisa A. Best with:
Lisa A. Best Canada
F Richard United States
Kathryn C. Oleson United States
Michael Y. Lau United States
Allan R. Buss Canada
James Ivory United States
Howard T. Everson United States
Howard E. Sypher United States
Malte Elson Germany
Teresa Garcia‐Marques Portugal
Jon Grahe relative to Lisa A. Best Canada Lisa A. Best's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Lisa A. Best · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jon Grahe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jon Grahe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jon Grahe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jon Grahe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jon Grahe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jon Grahe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jon Grahe. The network helps show where Jon Grahe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jon Grahe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jon Grahe Line = papers co-authored together Jon Grahe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996245
2 1999145
3 1998143
4 200074
5 202065
6 201247
7 201939
8 201038
9 201934
10 199526
11 200224
12 202022
13 201818
14 201217
15 201817
16 201316
17 201915
18 201512
19 201612
20 202011

About Jon Grahe

Jon Grahe is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (10 papers), Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research (6 papers), Identity, Memory, and Therapy (6 papers), Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences (4 papers), Youth Education and Societal Dynamics (3 papers), Communication in Education and Healthcare (3 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (3 papers) and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (550 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (218 citations), Applied Psychology (76 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (77 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (15 citations). Jon Grahe has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Frank J. Bernieri, Kipling D. Williams, Janet M. Davis, John S. Gillis, Wendelyn J. Shore, Robert C. Hauhart, Alan Reifman, Thomas W. Schubert, Janis Zickfeld and Dana C. Leighton. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Social Psychology, Emerging Adulthood, Frontiers in Psychology, Teaching Sociology and Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact