Kate Faasse

81 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Kate Faasse's Hit Papers

Acute mental health responses during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia 2020 · 328 citations
3280+2+4Years since publication100200300

Peers

Kate Faasse
Comparison fields: 5 of 147
  • Family Practice 85
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 773
  • Health 300
  • Applied Psychology 158
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 342
Replace Guido Van Hal with:
Guido Van Hal Belgium
Laura D. Scherer United States
Rolf Wynn Norway
Howard Brody United States
Karen Crotty United States
Carissa Bonner Australia
Yu‐Ping Chang United States
Denise de Ridder Netherlands
Pallab K Maulik India
Hala Sacre Lebanon
Kate Faasse relative to Guido Van Hal Belgium Guido Van Hal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Guido Van Hal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kate Faasse

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Faasse's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Faasse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Faasse more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Faasse

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Faasse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Faasse. The network helps show where Kate Faasse may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kate Faasse, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kate Faasse Line = papers co-authored together Kate Faasse links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 86 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Acute mental health responses during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia
Hit paper breakdown →
2020328
2 2020212
3 2011162
4 2015143
5 2013136
6 2014134
7 2016115
8 2012109
9 201499
10 201984
11 201279
12 201266
13 202065
14 200957
15 201554
16 201452
17 201448
18 201848
19 201646
20 201840

About Kate Faasse

Kate Faasse is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Applied Psychology and Health, having authored 86 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Management and Placebo Effect (26 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (9 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (7 papers), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (7 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (6 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (6 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (6 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (85 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (773 citations), Health (300 citations), Applied Psychology (158 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (342 citations). Kate Faasse has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Keith J. Petrie, Jill M. Newby, Leslie R. Martin, Andrew Grey, Samantha Tang, Helen Christensen, Kathleen O’Moore, Tim Cundy, Rob Horne and Andrew L. Geers. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Behavioral Medicine, Applied Psychology Health and Well-Being, Aesthetic Surgery Journal, Health Psychology and Journal of Psychosomatic Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact