John Tresch
Impact in
- Music top 2%
- Musicology and Musical Analysis
- Music History and Culture
- Diverse Musicological Studies
-
- Cybernetics and Technology in Society
- Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Papers in
-
- History of Science and Medicine 6
- History of Science and Natural History 4
- Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies 3
- Cybernetics and Technology in Society 2
- Philosophy 10
- Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis 4
- Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices 3
- Co-authors
- Emily I. Dolan (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Isis (3 papers)Osiris (2 papers)Anthropology Today (1 paper)Social Studies of Science (1 paper)Grey Room (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
John Tresch
25 papers receiving 214 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Music 66
- History and Philosophy of Science 47
- Geography, Planning and Development 30
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 25
- Philosophy 45
Countries citing papers authored by John Tresch
This map shows the geographic impact of John Tresch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Tresch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Tresch more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Tresch
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Tresch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Tresch. The network helps show where John Tresch may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 1 scholars most cited alongside John Tresch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 89 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 62 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 38 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 23 | |
| 5 | 2001 | 19 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 16 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 13 | |
| 9 | 1997 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2002 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 7 | |
| 12 | Emmanuel Grimaud et Zaven Paré, Le jour où les robots mangeront des pommes : conversations avec un Geminoid. Paris, Éditions Petra, coll. « Anthropologiques », 2011 | 2012 | 4 |
| 13 | 2011 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 4 | |
| 15 | les-maitres-fous | 2016 | 2 |
| 16 | 2010 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1998 | 2 | |
| 19 | Experimental ethics and the science of the meditating brain | 2011 | 2 |
| 20 | 2004 | 2 |
About John Tresch
John Tresch is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Literature and Literary Theory, Anthropology and Music, having authored 32 papers that have together received 331 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History of Science and Medicine (6 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (5 papers), History of Science and Natural History (4 papers), Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis (4 papers), Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies (3 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (3 papers), French Urban and Social Studies (2 papers) and Cybernetics and Technology in Society (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Music (66 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (47 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (30 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (25 citations) and Philosophy (45 citations). John Tresch has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Emily I. Dolan. Their work appears in journals such as Isis, Osiris, Anthropology Today, Social Studies of Science and Grey Room.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.