Daniel Herwitz

31 papers receiving 197 citations

Peers

Daniel Herwitz
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 53
  • Music 28
  • History and Philosophy of Science 41
  • Archeology 7
  • Philosophy 46
Replace P. N. Humble with:
P. N. Humble United Kingdom
Clement Greenberg United States
Mary Mothersill United States
Matthew Rampley United Kingdom
David Cast United States
Meyer Schapiro United States
John Onians United Kingdom
Edward Larrissy United Kingdom
Herman Roodenburg Netherlands
John Tresch United States
Daniel Herwitz relative to P. N. Humble United Kingdom P. N. Humble's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
P. N. Humble · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Herwitz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Herwitz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Herwitz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Herwitz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Herwitz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Herwitz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Herwitz. The network helps show where Daniel Herwitz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Herwitz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Herwitz Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Herwitz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999133
2
Race And Reconciliation: Essays From The New South Africa
200323
3 200617
4 199817
5 199514
6 201211
7 200810
8 20059
9 20118
10 20007
11 19974
12
South African Universities in the Tumult of Change
20083
13 20173
14 20153
15 19993
16 20042
17 20092
18 19882
19 20042
20 19952

About Daniel Herwitz

Daniel Herwitz is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Anthropology, Music and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 45 papers that have together received 297 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include South African History and Culture (6 papers), Musicology and Musical Analysis (5 papers), Art, Politics, and Modernism (4 papers), African history and culture studies (3 papers), Legal Issues in South Africa (2 papers), Law in Society and Culture (2 papers), Visual Culture and Art Theory (2 papers) and Theater, Performance, and Music History (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Visual Arts and Performing Arts (53 citations), Music (28 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (41 citations), Archeology (7 citations) and Philosophy (46 citations). Daniel Herwitz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Hungary and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Dominic McIver Lopes, Gary Shapiro, Lydia Goehr, Irving Lavin, David Carrier, Michael Kelly, Frédéric Le Marcis, Erwin Panofsky, Stephen Bann and William Allen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, Third Text, South African Journal of Philosophy, English Studies in Africa and The Germanic Review Literature Culture Theory.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact