Daniel Herwitz

24 papers receiving 135 citations

Peers

Daniel Herwitz
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 39
  • Archeology 6
  • History and Philosophy of Science 20
  • Music 12
  • Space and Planetary Science 3
Replace P. N. Humble with:
P. N. Humble United Kingdom
John Onians United Kingdom
David Cast United States
Matthew Rampley United Kingdom
Clement Greenberg United States
Meyer Schapiro United States
Moshe Barasch United States
Herschel B. Chipp United States
Martin Thom France
Priscilla Colt United States
Daniel Herwitz relative to P. N. Humble United Kingdom P. N. Humble's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
P. N. Humble · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Herwitz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Herwitz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Herwitz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Herwitz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Herwitz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Herwitz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Herwitz. The network helps show where Daniel Herwitz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Herwitz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Herwitz Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Herwitz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199977
2 199814
3 199511
4 201210
5
Race And Reconciliation: Essays From The New South Africa
20038
6 20058
7 20087
8 20116
9 20006
10 19974
11 20063
12 19993
13
South African Universities in the Tumult of Change
20082
14 19882
15 20042
16 19952
17 19932
18 19992
19 19912
20
Breaking Down Space & Time: Modernism
20001

About Daniel Herwitz

Daniel Herwitz is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Anthropology, Music and Law, having authored 36 papers that have together received 183 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include South African History and Culture (4 papers), Art, Politics, and Modernism (4 papers), Musicology and Musical Analysis (4 papers), African history and culture studies (2 papers), Law in Society and Culture (2 papers), Visual Culture and Art Theory (2 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers) and Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Visual Arts and Performing Arts (39 citations), Archeology (6 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (20 citations), Music (12 citations) and Space and Planetary Science (3 citations). Daniel Herwitz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Dominic McIver Lopes, Gary Shapiro, Lydia Goehr, Michael Kelly, David Carrier, Erwin Panofsky, Irving Lavin, Frédéric Le Marcis, William Allen and Stephen Bann. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, Third Text, South African Journal of Philosophy, English Literature in Transition 1880-1920 and Critical Inquiry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact