John T. Scott

8.0k citations
184 papers · 4.4k · h-index 33

Impact in

Papers in

John T. Scott

167 papers receiving 3.9k citations

Peers

John T. Scott
Comparison fields: 5 of 148
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 1.1k
  • Strategy and Management 1.6k
  • Economics and Econometrics 2.4k
  • Accounting 730
  • Business and International Management 75
Replace Robert J. Bennett with:
Robert J. Bennett United Kingdom
Ilan Vertinsky Canada
Dominique Foray Switzerland
Paulo Guimarães United States
Ulrich Schmoch Germany
Wilfred Dolfsma Netherlands
Robin Cowan Netherlands
John R. Bryson United Kingdom
Nabil Amara Canada
Aurora A.C. Teixeira Portugal
John T. Scott relative to Robert J. Bennett United Kingdom Robert J. Bennett's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Robert J. Bennett · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John T. Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John T. Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John T. Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John T. Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John T. Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John T. Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John T. Scott. The network helps show where John T. Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John T. Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John T. Scott Line = papers co-authored together John T. Scott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 184 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000374
2 2003245
3 2003193
4 1981186
5 2005173
6 1982152
7 2010152
8 2002150
9 2007100
10 2011100
11 200198
12 200994
13
Purposive Diversification and Economic Performance
199383
14 201683
15 200682
16 200582
17 199379
18 200378
19 199368
20 200362

About John T. Scott

John T. Scott is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management, Management of Technology and Innovation, Political Science and International Relations and Philosophy, having authored 184 papers that have together received 4.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovation Policy and R&D (38 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (24 papers), Rousseau and Enlightenment Thought (16 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (16 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (14 papers), Intellectual Property and Patents (13 papers), Political Theory and Influence (11 papers) and Private Equity and Venture Capital (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (1.1k citations), Strategy and Management (1.6k citations), Economics and Econometrics (2.4k citations), Accounting (730 citations) and Business and International Management (75 citations). John T. Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Albert N. Link, Stephen Martin, Bronwyn H. Hall, Brian H. Bornstein, David B. Audretsch, Richard E. Matland, Philip A. Michelbach, A. Michael Spence, Richard E. Caves and James F. Spriggs. Their work appears in journals such as Physics Today, The Journal of Technology Transfer, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, The Journal of Politics and Review of Industrial Organization.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact