John Suckling
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.05%
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 0.1%
- Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Papers in
-
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 93
- Autism Spectrum Disorder Research 52
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies 34
-
- Schizophrenia research and treatment 80
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research 22
- Co-authors
- Edward Thomas Bullmore (137 shared papers)Raymond M. Salvador (8 shared papers)Steven Williams (37 shared papers)Michael John Brammer (21 shared papers)Simon Baron‐Cohen (40 shared papers)Brandon J. Whitcher (3 shared papers)Sophie Achard (1 shared paper)Michael Vincent Lombardo (18 shared papers)
- Journals
- NeuroImage (26 papers)Schizophrenia Research (18 papers)Human Brain Mapping (18 papers)Biological Psychiatry (16 papers)The British Journal of Psychiatry (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesChina
In The Last Decade
John Suckling
398 papers receiving 31.5k citations
John Suckling's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 195
- Cognitive Neuroscience 13.9k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 7.9k
- Biological Psychiatry 312
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 3.1k
- Pharmacology 1.4k
Countries citing papers authored by John Suckling
This map shows the geographic impact of John Suckling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Suckling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Suckling more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Suckling
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Suckling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Suckling. The network helps show where John Suckling may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Suckling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 408 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A Resilient, Low-Frequency, Small-World Human Brain Functional Network with Highly Connected Association Cortical Hubs Hit paper breakdown → | 2006 | 2002 |
| 2 | Neurophysiological Architecture of Functional Magnetic Resonance Images of Human Brain Hit paper breakdown → | 2005 | 1115 |
| 3 | Neuroanatomical abnormalities before and after onset of psychosis: a cross-sectional and longitudinal MRI comparison Hit paper breakdown → | 2003 | 1111 |
| 4 | Brain charts for the human lifespan Hit paper breakdown → | 2022 | 1095 |
| 5 | The Mammographic Image Analysis Society digital mammogram database Hit paper breakdown → | 1994 | 998 |
| 6 | Global, voxel, and cluster tests, by theory and permutation, for a difference between two groups of structural MR images of the brain Hit paper breakdown → | 1999 | 973 |
| 7 | A meta-analysis of sex differences in human brain structure Hit paper breakdown → | 2014 | 887 |
| 8 | 2004 | 671 | |
| 9 | 2001 | 523 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 452 | |
| 11 | Quantitative multi-parameter mapping of R1, PD*, MT, and R2* at 3T: a multi-center validation Hit paper breakdown → | 2013 | 420 |
| 12 | 2001 | 401 | |
| 13 | Adolescence is associated with genomically patterned consolidation of the hubs of the human brain connectome Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 401 |
| 14 | 2005 | 392 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 387 | |
| 16 | Evidence-based prevention of Alzheimer's disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of 243 observational prospective studies and 153 randomised controlled trials Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 361 |
| 17 | 2009 | 311 | |
| 18 | 2014 | 300 | |
| 19 | 2009 | 296 | |
| 20 | 2007 | 291 |
About John Suckling
John Suckling is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Pharmacology, having authored 408 papers that have together received 32.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (93 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (80 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (52 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (34 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (23 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (22 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (20 papers) and Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (18 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (13.9k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (7.9k citations), Biological Psychiatry (312 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (3.1k citations) and Pharmacology (1.4k citations). John Suckling has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Edward Thomas Bullmore, Raymond M. Salvador, Steven Williams, Michael John Brammer, Simon Baron‐Cohen, Brandon J. Whitcher, Sophie Achard, Michael Vincent Lombardo, Meng‐Chuan Lai and Cinly Ooi. Their work appears in journals such as NeuroImage, Schizophrenia Research, Human Brain Mapping, Biological Psychiatry and The British Journal of Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.