John Rae

1.4k citations
50 papers · 1.1k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

John Rae

49 papers receiving 968 citations

Peers

John Rae
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Human-Computer Interaction 278
  • Language and Linguistics 360
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 265
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 174
  • Clinical Psychology 250
Replace Maurizio Tirassa with:
Maurizio Tirassa Italy
Paul Dickerson United Kingdom
Han Sloetjes Netherlands
Ayli̇n C. Küntay Türkiye
Janet B. Dean United States
Simpson W. L. Wong Hong Kong
Nicole Chovil Canada
Albert Russel Netherlands
Shelia M. Kennison United States
Luigi Anolli Italy
John Rae relative to Maurizio Tirassa Italy Maurizio Tirassa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Maurizio Tirassa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Rae

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Rae's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Rae with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Rae more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Rae

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Rae. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Rae. The network helps show where John Rae may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Rae, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Rae Line = papers co-authored together John Rae links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008280
2 200866
3 200762
4
Robotic Playmates: Analysing Interactive Competencies of Children with Autism Playing with a Mobile Robot
200255
5 201049
6 200140
7 200939
8 200938
9 200938
10 200833
11 200233
12 200731
13 201921
14 200720
15 200820
16 199317
17 199117
18 201416
19 200516
20 201313

About John Rae

John Rae is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Human-Computer Interaction, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (17 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (9 papers), Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (9 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (7 papers), Digital Communication and Language (5 papers), Language Development and Disorders (5 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (5 papers) and Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (278 citations), Language and Linguistics (360 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (265 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (174 citations) and Clinical Psychology (250 citations). John Rae has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Denmark and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Paul Dickerson, Penny Stribling, Anthony Steed, William Steptoe, Charles Antaki, Fabrizio Bercelli, Clare MacMartin, Ulrich Streeck, Anssi Peräkylä and Ivan Leudar. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, Counselling Psychology Quarterly, Journal of Pragmatics and Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact