C. M. Moore

498 citations
22 papers · 390 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

C. M. Moore

20 papers receiving 338 citations

Peers

C. M. Moore
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Human-Computer Interaction 53
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 86
  • Management Science and Operations Research 53
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 38
  • Social Psychology 58
Replace Zike Cao with:
Zike Cao China
Dale S. Klopfer United States
Joo-Wha Hong United States
Stefan Mayer Germany
Tove Klausen Denmark
Bartosz Gula Austria
Valdemar Danry United States
Katy Ilonka Gero United States
John Locke United States
C. M. Moore relative to Zike Cao China Zike Cao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Zike Cao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. M. Moore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. M. Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. M. Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. M. Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. M. Moore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. M. Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. M. Moore. The network helps show where C. M. Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside C. M. Moore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. M. Moore Line = papers co-authored together C. M. Moore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1988227
2 201250
3 200922
4 201518
5 201316
6 201313
7 201011
8 19997
9 20057
10 19984
11 20022
12 19842
13 20172
14
Delphi: An Overview, An Application, Some Lessons.
19772
15 19911
16 20121
17 20101
18 20101
19
Por qué mediamos
19971
20 19881

About C. M. Moore

C. M. Moore is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Social Psychology, Human-Computer Interaction and Computational Mechanics, having authored 22 papers that have together received 390 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (4 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (4 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (2 papers), 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis (2 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (2 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (2 papers) and Advanced Vision and Imaging (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (53 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (86 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (53 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (38 citations) and Social Psychology (58 citations). C. M. Moore has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include A. Çağlar Taş, Andrew Hollingworth, David J. Roberts, Rob Aspin, John Palmer, Robin Wolff, John Rae, Franco Tecchia, Ping Chen and Elisabeth M. Fine. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vision, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, Kybernetes and IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact