C. M. Moore

18 papers receiving 310 citations

Peers

C. M. Moore
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Human-Computer Interaction 45
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 80
  • Management Science and Operations Research 49
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 37
  • Social Psychology 51
Replace Dale S. Klopfer with:
Dale S. Klopfer United States
Anita Cremers Netherlands
Robert E. Horn United States
Jess Holbrook United States
Katy Ilonka Gero United States
Valdemar Danry United States
Nazlena Mohamad Ali Malaysia
Junghyo Lee United States
Kyle MacDonald United States
Ann‐Sofie Axelsson Sweden
C. M. Moore relative to Dale S. Klopfer United States Dale S. Klopfer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Dale S. Klopfer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. M. Moore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. M. Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. M. Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. M. Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. M. Moore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. M. Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. M. Moore. The network helps show where C. M. Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside C. M. Moore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. M. Moore Line = papers co-authored together C. M. Moore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 1988217
2 201248
3 200919
4 201316
5 201514
6 201311
7 20109
8 20057
9 19984
10
Delphi: An Overview, An Application, Some Lessons.
19772
11 19842
12 20022
13 20121
14 20101
15 20101
16 19881
17 19911
18 19881
19 20190

About C. M. Moore

C. M. Moore is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Human-Computer Interaction and Computational Mechanics, having authored 19 papers that have together received 357 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (4 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (3 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers), 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis (2 papers), Safety Warnings and Signage (2 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (2 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (2 papers) and Advanced Vision and Imaging (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (45 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (80 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (49 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (37 citations) and Social Psychology (51 citations). C. M. Moore has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include K. Anderson, Andrew Hollingworth, A. Çağlar Taş, David J. Roberts, Rob Aspin, John Palmer, Robin Wolff, Franco Tecchia, Elisabeth M. Fine and Ping Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vision, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics and Public Administration Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact