John R. Cotter

24 papers receiving 308 citations

Peers

John R. Cotter
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Neurology 85
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 38
  • General Dentistry 9
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 98
  • Neurology 18
Replace E. Teig with:
E. Teig Norway
Paul T. Turner United States
G. Campbell Australia
Mette Kirkegaard Sweden
Fumiro Suga United States
Lawrence J. Viernstein United States
Judith Marcela Dueñas Jiménez Mexico
C.F.L. Hinrichsen Australia
Zita Rovó Switzerland
M. E. Rosenberg United States
John R. Cotter relative to E. Teig Norway E. Teig's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
E. Teig · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John R. Cotter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John R. Cotter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John R. Cotter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John R. Cotter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John R. Cotter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John R. Cotter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John R. Cotter. The network helps show where John R. Cotter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside John R. Cotter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John R. Cotter Line = papers co-authored together John R. Cotter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196885
2 200165
3 198323
4 197922
5 198518
6 197217
7 199214
8 199714
9
Ultrastructure of remnant photoreceptors in advanced hereditary retinal degeneration.
198414
10 198711
11 198811
12 19929
13 19819
14 19898
15 19977
16
Cholecystokinin (CCK)-like immunoreactivity in the brain of the little brown bat (Myotis lucifugus).
19906
17 20085
18 19885
19 19815
20 19924

About John R. Cotter

John R. Cotter is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Social Psychology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 25 papers that have together received 362 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (5 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (4 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (4 papers), Bat Biology and Ecology Studies (4 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (3 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (2 papers), Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (2 papers) and Biomedical and Engineering Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (85 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (38 citations), General Dentistry (9 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (98 citations) and Neurology (18 citations). John R. Cotter has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Frederick A. Simeone, Lois K. Laemle, Roberta J. Pentney, R.G. Erickson, Werner K. Noell, H. Burton, Jerilyn A. Walker, Frank Cerny, John P. Laurent and Daniel J. Brown. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of neurosurgery, The Journal of Comparative Neurology, Experimental Brain Research, Academic Medicine and Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact