R.G. Erickson
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Neural dynamics and brain function
- Neurology top 5%
- Vestibular and auditory disorders
Papers in
-
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms 10
- Neural dynamics and brain function 4
-
- Vestibular and auditory disorders 5
- Co-authors
- Peter Thier (4 shared papers)Richard A. Andersen (1 shared paper)Stefan Treue (1 shared paper)C. Distler (2 shared papers)Neal H. Barmack (2 shared papers)Bruce M. Dow (2 shared papers)K.-P. Hoffmann (1 shared paper)Wolfgang Mader (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Experimental Brain Research (6 papers)Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (1 paper)Brain Research (1 paper)European Journal of Neuroscience (1 paper)The Journal of Comparative Neurology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyAustria
In The Last Decade
R.G. Erickson
12 papers receiving 918 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Cognitive Neuroscience 836
- Neurology 203
- Ophthalmology 150
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 258
- Molecular Biology 276
Countries citing papers authored by R.G. Erickson
This map shows the geographic impact of R.G. Erickson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R.G. Erickson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R.G. Erickson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by R.G. Erickson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R.G. Erickson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R.G. Erickson. The network helps show where R.G. Erickson may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 12 scholars most cited alongside R.G. Erickson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1991 | 380 | |
| 2 | 1992 | 127 | |
| 3 | 1991 | 116 | |
| 4 | 1988 | 91 | |
| 5 | 1992 | 54 | |
| 6 | 1991 | 48 | |
| 7 | 1980 | 37 | |
| 8 | 1989 | 36 | |
| 9 | 1983 | 23 | |
| 10 | 1980 | 21 | |
| 11 | 1989 | 20 | |
| 12 | 1994 | 3 |
About R.G. Erickson
R.G. Erickson is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Ophthalmology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Molecular Biology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 956 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (10 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (7 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (5 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (3 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (2 papers), Ocular and Laser Science Research (1 paper) and Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (836 citations), Neurology (203 citations), Ophthalmology (150 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (258 citations) and Molecular Biology (276 citations). R.G. Erickson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Peter Thier, Richard A. Andersen, Stefan Treue, C. Distler, Neal H. Barmack, Bruce M. Dow, K.-P. Hoffmann, Wolfgang Mader, K.‐P. Hoffmann and John R. Cotter. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Brain Research, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Brain Research, European Journal of Neuroscience and The Journal of Comparative Neurology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.