E. Teig

28 papers receiving 469 citations

Peers

E. Teig
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Sensory Systems 129
  • Otorhinolaryngology 50
  • Speech and Hearing 53
  • Neurology 59
  • Physiology 144
Replace H Faye-Lund with:
H Faye-Lund Norway
Mark Parker United States
Björn Carlborg Sweden
Fabrice Giraudet France
H.C. Dodson United Kingdom
A Guilhaume France
W. J. Oosterveld Netherlands
Pifu Luo United States
Tony Sirimanna United Kingdom
Jae Yun Jung South Korea
E. Teig relative to H Faye-Lund Norway H Faye-Lund's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
H Faye-Lund · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Teig

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Teig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Teig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Teig more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Teig

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Teig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Teig. The network helps show where E. Teig may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. Teig, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Teig Line = papers co-authored together E. Teig links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197277
2 200654
3 197852
4 197842
5 197633
6 198132
7 197232
8 197227
9 196823
10 200822
11 199920
12 197320
13 201016
14
Functional results after experimental reinnervation of the posterior cricoarytenoid muscle in dogs.
198614
15 198510
16 19868
17 19677
18
A histochemical evaluation of experimentally reinnervated canine laryngeal muscles.
19867
19 19875
20 19924

About E. Teig

E. Teig is a scholar working on Physiology, Biomedical Engineering, Sensory Systems, Otorhinolaryngology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 29 papers that have together received 521 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Voice and Speech Disorders (6 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (5 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (5 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (4 papers), Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (4 papers), Cleft Lip and Palate Research (3 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (3 papers) and Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (129 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (50 citations), Speech and Hearing (53 citations), Neurology (59 citations) and Physiology (144 citations). E. Teig has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, Denmark and United States. Frequent co-authors include Hans A. Dahl, Kjell Brøndbo, Henrik H. Lindeman, Fredrik Bendiksen, Toril Fagerheim, Oddvar Stokke, Egil Jellum, Trond P. Leren, Sten Harris and Ketil Heimdal. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Oto-Laryngologica, Ear and Hearing, International Journal of Audiology, European Journal of Human Genetics and Scandinavian Audiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact