John Pym

1.7k citations
87 papers · 1.2k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

John Pym

76 papers receiving 877 citations

Peers

John Pym
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Algebra and Number Theory 374
  • Mathematical Physics 602
  • Geometry and Topology 355
  • Applied Mathematics 230
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 288
Replace Bernard R. Gelbaum with:
Bernard R. Gelbaum United States
Ebbe Thue Poulsen Denmark
R. Creighton Buck United States
G. J. O. Jameson United Kingdom
Edward Fadell United States
William F. Donoghue United States
Stanisław Łojasiewicz Poland
Peter Rosenthal Canada
Lee A. Rubel United States
William N. Anderson United States
John Pym relative to Bernard R. Gelbaum United States Bernard R. Gelbaum's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Bernard R. Gelbaum · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Pym

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Pym's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Pym with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Pym more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Pym

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Pym. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Pym. The network helps show where John Pym may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside John Pym, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Pym Line = papers co-authored together John Pym links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 87 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1980293
2 196265
3 200863
4 199052
5 198745
6 200843
7 197638
8 198435
9 199029
10 197027
11 199325
12 199523
13 198721
14 196619
15 199217
16 199817
17 199016
18
The Time out film guide
199813
19 196913
20 200313

About John Pym

John Pym is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Geometry and Topology, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Algebra and Number Theory and Applied Mathematics, having authored 87 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Topology and Set Theory (40 papers), Advanced Banach Space Theory (22 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (19 papers), Advanced Operator Algebra Research (19 papers), semigroups and automata theory (15 papers), Rings, Modules, and Algebras (12 papers), Functional Equations Stability Results (10 papers) and Fuzzy and Soft Set Theory (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Algebra and Number Theory (374 citations), Mathematical Physics (602 citations), Geometry and Topology (355 citations), Applied Mathematics (230 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (288 citations). John Pym has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include V. Hutson, Anthony Lau, Anthony To‐Ming Lau, Paul Milnes, Eberhard Kaniuth, Hazel Perfect, Neil Hindman, A. Ülger, Jimmie Lawson and Karl H. Hofmann. Their work appears in journals such as Semigroup Forum, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, Journal of the London Mathematical Society, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society and Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact